NINAs and Egg Breakers (Pitching a VC)

Posted on Jun 28, 2009 | 2 comments


iStock_000000556006Small

NINA

After a debate that several of us had at a recent DealMaker Media event in Los Angeles, my friend and fellow SoCal venture capitalist Peter Lee wrote a post recently about the different roles within a VC and spent much time on the role of an associate.  VC’s keep different titles but the most common that I’ve come across that are investment professionals are (in ascending order of seniority): analyst, associate, principal and partner.  These are the permanent members of a VC.  Then there is the EIR (entrepreneur in residence) who is usually at a VC for a temporary period of time and other individuals such as venture partners or operating partners.

The process for raising money from a VC is a sales process and as such much of what is taught in enterprise sales can be applied.  My initial career was as a software developer, database designer, product manager and then project manager.  So running a sales process wasn’t originally in my professional toolkit.  Some of the best advice came from a senior sales coach in Germany named Kai Krickel who ran a consultancy with the appropriately name of TEDIC (the excuse department is closed).  He had formerly run country operations for a very prominent enterprise sales company called PTC.  I’ll cover more sales lessons in a separate section of the blog, but for now some thoughts about people you’ll meet in the VC process:

1. Some people have authority (A)

Somebody with authority is a decision maker.  That’s obviously a good starting point in any sales process.  I’ve always subscribed to the “call high” philosophy of sales where you hope that your initial entry into any organization is the highest level at which you can usefully be introduced.  In a VC firm the people with authority are clearly partners, although some firms have principals that also have authority.  But don’t confuse authority with “sole” authority.  Often times in a VC firm, as with enterprise sales, getting to yes requires multiple partners to agree.  And don’t assume that because a person’s title is “managing partner” or “founding partner” that this necessarily means that person has more authority than other partners.  In every firm, VC or otherwise, there are people who get deals done.  They are people who are persuasive (see point 3 below), who compile relevant facts and who are willing to put their reputations on the line to get a deal done.  You’ve likely dealt with this if you’ve done sales or biz dev in your job.  You’ve likely met SVP’s in companies that never seem comfortable with pushing though decisions without a large number of other people validating the decision.  The same can be true with VC partners – some push deals through and some seek broad consensus or air cover.    But anybody that has authority (read: a vote) must be treated seriously.  You need to understand and get to know the interests, issues and concerns of every person who has authority over the decision that your firm wants.  Every person with authority has a vote.  And don’t assume that just because you have a partner as your “champion” that it means that you don’t need to spend time with the other partners so that they also feel bought in.

2. Some people have influence (I)

I’ve made it clear that my preference when I’m selling is to always “call high” but let’s face it – you can’t always start at the top.  In VC you might get an introduction to a partner through a colleague of yours who is a lawyer or an entrepreneur but the partner may ask for the deal to initially be screened by somebody more junior in their firm.  Don’t view this as a slight.  When you think about a typical VC who sits on 5-7 boards, has to raise money for his/her firm so that they can invest, has to help run the operations of their fun, is swamped with inbound emails or requests for meetings and gets involved with industry events like speaking at conference, there is always going to be a need to get some leverage by having trusted resources help evaluate your company.

When you spend time with analysts, associates, principals and even EIR’s realize that many of them have “influence” (e.g. they can recommend whether or not your team gets more time and attention).  But just remember (as per Peter’s post) that they are  not check writers.  Kai taught me in sales to be careful not to make assumptions that because somebody’s job title is high that they have influence or because a person’s job title is lower means that they don’t have influence.  And each analyst or associate may have different levels of influence with different partners.  So how could you find all this out?

I have heard some people in VC round table debates say not to bother spending too much time researching the individuals of a VC firm – you have more important stuff to focus on.  I disagree.  I think if you’re running a sales campaign to raise money and you’ve identified a firm that you think will be a good fit for you that you should put in the time.  And frankly if you do get a term sheet one day these are the people you’ll be working with so the more you know them (and their reputation) the better.  The most obvious way to know about your contact’s influence is to network with portfolio companies or other entrepreneurs that have pitched this VC before and get their insights.

If you build good rapport with the non-partner resources then you might be able to get clues from them about how to get deals approved by the partners.  See if they will help you figure out which partner is likely to be most interested in your company’s space.  And get advice from them on how to best manage the approval process.  Importantly, ask for their support in getting the partner meeting set up.  These are all things that an enterprise sales person would do in their sales process.

3. Some people have influence & authority (IA … aka Egg Breakers)

Obviously the people that you REALLY want to get access to are the people with both influence and authority.  These are the broken-eggspeople I call “egg breakers” because they’re willing to get rough to get things done.  These are the people that will metaphorically (or sometimes literally) slam the table and say “we need to do this deal and here’s why …”.  They not only have a vote at the table but the skill & will to get decisions made.  Very few investment decisions are unanimous “no brainers” – just imagine having been pitched Google in a world where you had previous search engines like Alta Vista or given the success of Yahoo!  Imagine having been pitched Facebook in a world where MySpace seemed to be running away with market share or more recently having been pitched Twitter when Facebook seemed unstoppable.  Your goal in any sales process is to find and nurture egg breakers.  VC is no exception.

4. Some people have No Influence & No Authority (NINA)

But of course the people you need to be the most careful about spending too much time with are people with No Influence & No Authority (so called NINAs).  In enterprise sales these are the people that worry me the most because they are often the easiest to meet and spend the most time with you.  I’ve worked with many sales reps over the years who spend time with time-wasting NINAs because they’re easy and make you feel good.  NINAs will tell you that your products are great and that your competitors stink.  It’s hard to go into the lion’s den and see the people who are most cynical or give you a rough time.  So many people naturally gravitate towards NINAs.  Remember that not only can they not make decisions but the I is key – they have no influence.  People tend not to listen to them very much or they don’t have good political support to get initiatives approved.

How do you know when you have a NINA?  Aside from the obvious point I always harp on about (asking portfolio companies and other entrepreneurs that have pitched to them before), the best way to tell is when you ask them to help you with the next step (e.g. getting to a partner meeting) and they’re either not able to do it or they keep requesting 3 more meetings before getting there.

NINA’s take on another form in VC, though, which are the “VC Zombies”.  These are the funds that are at the end of the life on their investments and do not seem to be able to raise a new fund.  They continue to take meetings with entrepreneurs but they never fund anything (because they can’t).  These are very easy to flush out with some basic research: how many deals has the fund done in the past 3 years and when was their current fund raised (many funds are 10 years in length).  No new money, no new deals = NINA.

The only way to deal with NINAs in enterprise sales or in VC is to go directly to somebody else in the firm who has either influence or authority.  Or talk with a different VC.

  • Pingback: Twitted by nathan892

  • Marc Winitz

    Mark,

    This is a great blog with a lot of value. One thing that is worth mentioning in any sales process (VC, Enterprise, etc…) is the value a NINA can provide in simply providing information you may not have. All sales involves the concept of “triangulation” which simply means you have a piece of information you are trying to validate from another source. Definitely a role a NINA can play and/or they can provide a piece of information you may be missing which you can then take and validate elsewhere. To your point, don’t spend a lot of time with NINA’s but don’t discard them either. They can provide value to your sales process if engaged properly.

    – Marc Winitz

  • marksuster

    Hey, Marc. Great point. Totally agree. In our enterprise sales process we defined roles in a company (e.g. champion, check-writer, enemy, influencer, technical champion) and one of the roles we had was “sage”. This was often somebody who had been in the company a long time and people mostly discounted. Sometimes they were NINAs. But they were always an important source of information about the company. Thanks for your comments.

  • Pingback: NINAs and Egg Breakers (Pitching a VC) | CloudAve