Protect Your Parents from Avis Budget: Direct Marketing Scumbags

by Mark Suster on December 20, 2009

budget-avis-logosThis has been a year where people got mad in mass at financial institutions.  It’s hard not to when you think about the amount of money that flowed into their coffers and the size of expected bonuses this year – of all years.  Frankly, it disgusts me.

But I’m not one to take on the big investment banks – I’ll save that for somebody else.  But something happened during my Thanksgiving break that has me so extremely pissed off at the predatory practices of a financial institution the preys on the elderly, less educated and lower-income people that can least afford it.  It made me so mad that I would dedicate 2 hours of my Sunday to publicizing it and use this platform to talk about it.  I hope you’re OK with that.  At a minimum maybe it could prompt you to check in on your relatives that might easily fall prey to deceptive practices.  But I’m also sending this to a couple of class-action lawyers.

Trilegiant Corporation, (who is owned by Avis Budget Group (yes, that Avis & Budget), in turn owned by the private equity group Apollo Management) does business as PrivacyGuard and has engaged in the most unethical of business practices I have come across in years.  It dupes uneducated or elderly people into spending thousands of dollars.

It seems this is already widely known as reported in this Wikipedia article about the Affinion / Treligient Group, “According to the Better Business Bureau, thousands of issues have been reported by consumers for deceptive selling practices, unauthorized charges to consumers’ credit cards, and failure to respond or resolve issues. Many of these complaints stem from the charges individuals found on their credit card statements.” Or again here in Consumer Affairs dating back to 2005.

Background
I was home visiting my father in Sacramento.  My dad has Parkinson’s disease, which mostly affects your body but over time begins, like aging itself, to play a part in memory loss and lack of general organization skills that we possess in our youth.  My dad was and is a smart person.  He’s a retired pediatrician. But in the past few years I’ve entered what is called the “sandwich years” in which you start helping to take care of your parents as well as young kids.  I have mostly taken over helping my dad with his finances.

I was going through some of his bills and noticed that on his credit card he was being charged about $60 / month for a combination of “privacy protection” and an “identity protection.”  I asked him why he signed up for these services and he said that he wasn’t really aware that he had signed up or why he did.  He has been billed all year or more than $600 in total. At the time I felt that somehow somebody from this organization must have taken advantage of my dad but I had no proof so I just worked with my mom to help him cancel the service and chalked it up to a nasty lesson.

Then just a few weeks later (yesterday) I found this check in my mail.

IMG00036-20091220-1714This company is sending what looks like an $8.25 check to me.  I could easily see how the elderly or people who are less educated could have just thought it was a check and cashed it.  But there is fine print (font size probably 8) beneath the actual amount on the check that says “By cashing or depositing this check you are purchasing a membership in PrivacyGuard.”  Then it was clear to me how my dad was duped.  He would see a check with his name on it and just deposit it in his bank.  How is this legal?  I tried to find out who this company was and it is quite difficult.  The PrivacyGuard website says very little.  Frank Abagnale has lent his name to this unethical company (he’s the guy featured in “Catch Me if You Can.”)  I note that the company is happy to put Frank’s mug on their website but not any of the management team on either site.  Hiding from something?

I had to put in a bit of web research to uncover an intricate web of ownership that leads to the Avis Budget ownership and worse still up to a well-known private equity group called Apollo.  My research reveals that this known scam artist company has been duping customers for some time.  See this article talking about previous class action lawsuits.

I was pleased when Michael Arrington wrote his Scamville series.  I hate the thought of parents being duped into signing up for services like monthly ringtones without their knowledge and often by kids who don’t understand the financial consequences of hitting a few quick buttons on a computer.  It reminded me of the way that the ringtone companies marketed themselves 10 years ago and the articles about lower-income mothers having to foot the bill for hundreds of dollars for their kids.  It absolutely disgusts me.

But this is a new low. Preying not only on lower-income, less educated people but on the elderly.  And in this economy where people can scarcely afford it.  I know many of you have seen scams like this and it’s easy just to be disgusted and throw it out.  But I’m hoping to find some lawyers or legislators interested in doing something.

If anybody has any access to Charles Schummer, Barney Frank or anybody else in congress involved with financial services reform I’d love your help in reaching out to them.  Somebody has stop scumbags like Trilegiant Corporation / Avis Budget and its owners, Apollo Management, from these forms of deceit on our most susceptible members of society.

What do you think? … have you had similar experiences? … should I avoid blog posts like this that might be outside my normal remit?

UPDATE: Thanks to Scott Shapiro for pointing to the management team in the comments. Former CEO (and now Chairman of the board) is Nethaniel Lipman.  Wow.  He’s ex Skadden Arps (one of the top law firms in New York) and ex Walt Disney legal dept.  You would read his bio and think he’s an upstanding individual.  I wonder what possessed him? … $$$?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • HackerNews
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • I think there might be some confusion here concerning the ownership of Affinion/Trilegiant. This business is in no way owned by or affiliated with Avis Budget.

    Trilegiant is one of the subsidiaries of Affinion Group. These membership/loyalty marketing services companies typically have a multitude of subsidiaries that they operate under. Affinion Group was purchased from Cendant a number of years ago. Cendant for many years was a large conglomerate with businesses spanning a variety of industries, such as hospitality, real estate brokerage, tax preparation, car rentals, etc. Businesses that Cendant owned include Wyndham (Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson, etc.), Orbitz, Jackson Hewitt, Avis Budget, Wright Express, Realogy (Coldwell Banker, Century 21, etc.), CUC, etc. Apollo acquired Cendant's loyalty marketing business when they were in the process of splitting up the company (this business adopted the name Affinion after Apollo bought it, but is probably better known by its original name, CUC). I think the Avis Budget confusion here exists because as Cendant split itself up, every business that Cendant owned was sold or spun-off, except for Avis Budget, and so Avis Budget is technically the former Cendant Corporation. Also, Apollo had acquired Affinion, and they later also acquired Realogy, but they do not own Avis Budget.

    I agree that this is a terrible, despicable business. I thought it was important to clear Avis Budget of any wrongdoing here as the title of this post seems to vilify them. Fortunately, these businesses are finally receiving a bit of attention from regulators. The US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation actually recently released a report concerning one of the most prevalent distribution channels for these companies, which is post-transaction marketing with online retailers. That report can be found here: http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fus...

    An interesting side note is that CUC, the former name of Affinion, is better known for being one of the largest accounting frauds in US history.

    I hope this makes sense and clears things up a little.
  • This is interesting, after the 2001 class action I was also billed on a card for "PrivacyGuard" (2 $30 charges before I caught them).

    I didn't get any check in the mail, I just got a phone call saying they were from the bank and had my account information already, and I didn't implicitly agree to anything. They were asking if I was concerned with identity theft, and I said, "Sure, who isn't, that's why I follow the published best practices".

    Apparently that was enough for them to charge me.

    Maybe we should do an Internet-takeover and buy out AINV stock, then work to get everybody fired? I already own some :(
  • Astor Place
    Just awful. This is not clever business or marketing. This is pure fraud and should be treated as a criminal activity with huge. I am getting more and more tired of crooked business practices and less patient with them. Remember AOL and how impossible it was to cancel their subscription once you had it? A friend of mine struggled for a year to cancel them.... Total fraud. Look how bad their reputation is now! No one wants anything to do with AOL.
  • jelliott
    Received a similar check from 1800-flowers. It initially appeared like a refund check of some kind, but instead it was a check that if cashed would subscribe me to a 19.99 a month service, from another company "Elite Excursions" (back of check http://www.ifileroom.com/temp/flowers-check-bac...). Looks like they may also be affiliated with Trilegiant. 1800-Flowers will not be receiving more business from me.
  • Ms. Thompson
    I have not had any problems in this area. I always try to be very careful and so far I have been. In my opinion I think Mr Lipman learned over the years how easy it is to take money from people just by working for those top companies. Also in my opinion those top companies are where they are not because of the cases they win, but because of the amount of money they get. I am not a fan of big business. I think there should be very stiff penalties, fines and jail time for companies who do this kind of low down, dirty scamming of our elderly and other people who don't know about these things. These folks are mostly trusting and scammers play on that trust.

    Blog about anything you like. All my comments here are just my opinion. Thanks.
  • Well now that you have this information, you can organize for protection against this sort of actions.
  • classic - i just punched in Cendant.com and - Hey presto!!!

    i am very familiar with this business model - if thats what you want to call it.
  • this likely all leads back to the scab on the underbelly.......Cendant. They operate in this grey area (conceived and taught mind you at the harvard business school - and practiced by some of its grads) that sits at the apex of Affinity Marketing and direct marketing.

    My first job out of college was for one such organization that followed this type of model - they were essentially a 'communications company' - really a switchless reseller (buying bulk LD minutes from Sprint and worldcomm) that would then sell in the "association of elderely retired electricians". Exactly how our friend Mr ebbers got his start.

    you would be shocked at the cash that these schemes kick off.
  • Mark,

    Horrible, but not surprising. My firm has sued Avis and Budget for excessive Fuel Service Charges. They fight hard. Any of the class actions firms expressed an interest yet?

    Austin Tighe
    austin@feazell-tighe.com
  • No - don't avoid blog posts like this. I am running into more and more of these myself, and my parents are falling into a paranoid frame of mind where this country they've moved to to join me and my family is conspiring to steal from them at every opportunity. I have to say it's hard to fault them for it.

    A bonus feature of the socially connected world where we're all a micro-celebrity with an audience, is that we get to talk about this stuff, and eventually the accumulation of communication from forums like this outweighs that coming form the channels open to the scammers and predators.

    I appreciated @arrington's efforts and I like what you're doing here. It's too easy to feel powerless against institutions who buy protection from the body politic and build their business models in ways that are clearly and obviously scams. I have my own beef with banks stealing money from their customers and calling them fees. My wife and I have a close friend who's in some real financial difficulty who had $600 of fees on her account (she only clears a litle less than $2k per month) based on a paycheck being a day late and a bunch of small transactions (sub $20) posting on her account before it hit. She doesn't have the option of just not letting transactions go through and being told at the point of purchase no funds available. They provide the "service" of advancing the money then charging her a fee - a service she cannot opt out of. Then of course no money for bills, then more fees and before you know it the bank is taxing her 20-30% of her income every month in fees she cannot escape from. Powerless.

    Thanks for sharing. People are often embarrassed about these scams and that's how they hide for so long. Keep fighting the good fight.
  • ldmangin
    Definitely worthwhile posting, and most definitely horrible.

    Interestingly enough, it's given me a business idea!
  • davidshore
    Mark, THANKS very much for this.

    It's amazing how the new scams are growing in scope and scale and how we are all vulnerable, especially in a hectic world when we don't check the details on small items like a $8.25 check.

    So in answer to your question about posts outside of your typical theme, I am a regular reader and appreciate it. Ditto for Arrington's posts, which were closer to his theme since it related to social networks, yet they resulted in a catalyst for change among most of those companies, I recall. I hope your post has the same effect.

    I wish I could help on this particular scam, like some other readers in the comments here, but will keep my eyes open.
  • I got a similar check in a mail a few months back. If I cashed in the check, it would automatically enroll me in a $14.99 per month "plan" with budget for 12 months. This is ridiculous!
  • Great, appalling, appropriate and welcome post.

    Now, how can new tech help prevent this problem? What could we build on new tech to prevent this problem? #inspiration
  • You'll probably never be able to rent a car from Budget or Avis again after this posting ;-)
  • davidshore
    He'll probably never want to either
  • the hallmark of a blog star is their ability to motivate and inspire the crowd to taking action, so in this regard i think you should use your blog as you see fit, and that it will prove to be advantageous to blog about whatever you are passionate about -- in doing so you will attract similar passion in your fans, and will find it easier to motivate them to taking action.

    of course personally i have to wonder what is the point of calling congress about avis, as if there aren't bigger problems in the world, for your parents and everyone else. and avis probably is scumbags but compared to those who are creating even bigger problems for your parents and all others i would wager avis is a bunch of angels. i mean 9/11 was an inside job, that says it all, if anyone wants to call congress why not call about that.

    also as for the disney dude....disney is a highly sketchy company to those who study occult stuff and media mind control stuff. i know that is a bit off the kook deep end so to give a normalized example just think of britney spears, she comes up as a little pop princess through teh disney system, now she sings these super sexual songs that pretend to be subtle (but are really quite overt) that get targeted to disney's audience of children. so, the company's morals are questionable. if the company is immoral, that means some of its key members are immoral, so that fits the scenario a bit in this case.
  • ARebant
    The investment firm is just as much to blame. This being their portfolio company they keep their eye one, surely they know the strategies...
  • ARebant
    The investment firm is just as much to blame. This being their portfolio company that they keep their eye one, surely they know the strategies...
  • Hey Mark. I've been enjoying your blog. And glad to see you're doing well.

    I think this stuff is definitely worthwhile. If you have an audience, you have the power to effect change by bringing these kinds of practices to the light of day. That's the power of the internet and it's what will stop companies behaving this way. Now that we've got the power, we should use it. Arrington's Scamville series was real journalism. Your post is equally worthwhile.

    Best wishes,
    Evan
  • Sam
    "Preying on ..." not "Praying on ..."
  • doh. typo. Had it right 3 times, typing too fast. Thanks for spotting.
  • Also, Affinion Group (management team - http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=198...) seems to be the parent of Trilegiant (linkedin company profile - http://www.linkedin.com/companies/trilegiant).

    I imagine that some readers of this blog are 1 or 2 degrees away from some of these senior execs and might be able to get in a word or 2.
  • Thanks for the link. I added as an update to the post.
  • Great post - definitely worthwhile!

    As my marketing professor said during our last class, "I teach you marketing tools and frameworks, but it's up to you guys to figure out what to use them for." Without saying it, he meant that future business leaders should focus on building value for society and not arbitraging / scamming each other. And this post really hits the message home.
  • Yes, too many companies are focused on arb type opportunities that take money from unsophisticated people. This sucks.
  • That is the kind of shit that makes me want to go postal.

    I actually think you should mix some of this type of stuff in your blog. While your posts are always interesting and informative I think there is also a lot of value as a reader when you give insight on how you look at a particular situation.

    I loved this post!
  • Thanks, Jamie. I feel like going postal, too. But my cousin is a class-action litigator and I think I'll just go legal.
  • This is so familiar to me -- not at the big business level, like what you experienced, but at the local level.

    My elderly mother lives at my house and helps take care of it while I'm out of the country on business. Like your father, she's a bright person and is now afflicted with neurological problems that cause her to make simple mistakes. During one of my trips earlier this year she phoned to tell me that she decided to call a plumber to fix a slow drip in an upstairs bathroom. (I've been putting off little repairs for a while -- the joys of bootstrapping a start-up, eh?) The plumber's bill, which she had already paid: about $940. This is a ten-year-old house, not an antique. My guess is that the bill is probably the cost of many year's worth of dripping.

    Honestly, I have trouble understanding how any business person, plumber, etc., who has ever had an elderly family member could take advantage of people like this. I saw the same thing happen to my grandmother 20 years ago. It boggles the mind.

    No, please post this sort of thing. I don't know about other regular readers of your blog but it touched a big nerve with me. I'm as much a believer in free markets as the next guy but one of the key principles of working markets is transparency and what you just described is a deliberate attempt to circumvent it. I really, really doubt that they're not aware of it, either, and that's what makes it so shameful. Maybe posts like this remind entrepreneurs that there's a difference between clever and immoral.
  • ARebant
    Mark, no bad motives here but you have to admit this kind of incidents are more prominent with MALE run businesses. The elderly should be more cautious to hire male run businesses as their chances to be deceived is greater. Do you know an average 94% of all major crimes are committed by men irrespective what country or society you look at the stats in? Serious sexual crimes are committed 99% by men. My question is; WHY do men lead, involve and generate so much deception, and how do we change this in society? What would be the key to change this? Should there be a different method of educating young boys? Interestingly crimes by women are on the increase for the first time in many years.
  • Thanks for your input. It's an awful story also. A lot of my neighbors here in LA are elderly so I think I'm thinking more about the issue these days.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: What Makes an Entrepreneur (5/11) – Inspiration

Next post: What Makes an Entrepreneur? Perspiration (6/11)