<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Productivity Hacks: Voicemail, Folders &amp; To-Do&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur turned VC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9200</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Productivity Hacks: Eliminate Voicemail &#8211; A Frog in the Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-3/#comment-3353</link>
		<dc:creator>Productivity Hacks: Eliminate Voicemail &#8211; A Frog in the Valley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-3353</guid>
		<description>[...] Productivity Hacks: Eliminate Voicemail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Productivity Hacks: Eliminate Voicemail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladik Rikhter</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-3/#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladik Rikhter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-3354</guid>
		<description>Random (possibly incorrect source) of info in regards to getting 3 things done everyday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I once heard an entrepreneur give a talk on how useful this was for him.  He told the crowd that Andrew Carnegie had hired a consultant to follow him around for a few weeks and determine how to make him more efficient.  At the end of the research phase, Carnegie sat down with the man and asked him to report on his findings.  The man suggested that everyday he write down 3 things and get those 3 things done first at all cost.  Carnegie originally found this to be preposterous and got angry, immediately asking the man how much he owed him for such consulting services.  The man said in return, no need to pay me now, I will come back in a year and you will determine then how much you can pay me.  A year later he paid him $1 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure its a story that could be applied to any businessman in any time setting, but this was how I first heard and I thought I&#039;d share it here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random (possibly incorrect source) of info in regards to getting 3 things done everyday.</p>
<p>I once heard an entrepreneur give a talk on how useful this was for him.  He told the crowd that Andrew Carnegie had hired a consultant to follow him around for a few weeks and determine how to make him more efficient.  At the end of the research phase, Carnegie sat down with the man and asked him to report on his findings.  The man suggested that everyday he write down 3 things and get those 3 things done first at all cost.  Carnegie originally found this to be preposterous and got angry, immediately asking the man how much he owed him for such consulting services.  The man said in return, no need to pay me now, I will come back in a year and you will determine then how much you can pay me.  A year later he paid him $1 million.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure its a story that could be applied to any businessman in any time setting, but this was how I first heard and I thought I&#39;d share it here <img src='http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladik Rikhter</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-3/#comment-11724</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladik Rikhter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-11724</guid>
		<description>Random (possibly incorrect source) of info in regards to getting 3 things done everyday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I once heard an entrepreneur give a talk on how useful this was for him.  He told the crowd that Andrew Carnegie had hired a consultant to follow him around for a few weeks and determine how to make him more efficient.  At the end of the research phase, Carnegie sat down with the man and asked him to report on his findings.  The man suggested that everyday he write down 3 things and get those 3 things done first at all cost.  Carnegie originally found this to be preposterous and got angry, immediately asking the man how much he owed him for such consulting services.  The man said in return, no need to pay me now, I will come back in a year and you will determine then how much you can pay me.  A year later he paid him $1 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure its a story that could be applied to any businessman in any time setting, but this was how I first heard and I thought I&#039;d share it here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random (possibly incorrect source) of info in regards to getting 3 things done everyday.</p>
<p>I once heard an entrepreneur give a talk on how useful this was for him.  He told the crowd that Andrew Carnegie had hired a consultant to follow him around for a few weeks and determine how to make him more efficient.  At the end of the research phase, Carnegie sat down with the man and asked him to report on his findings.  The man suggested that everyday he write down 3 things and get those 3 things done first at all cost.  Carnegie originally found this to be preposterous and got angry, immediately asking the man how much he owed him for such consulting services.  The man said in return, no need to pay me now, I will come back in a year and you will determine then how much you can pay me.  A year later he paid him $1 million.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure its a story that could be applied to any businessman in any time setting, but this was how I first heard and I thought I&#39;d share it here <img src='http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladik Rikhter</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-3/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladik Rikhter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>Random (possibly incorrect source) of info in regards to getting 3 things done everyday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I once heard an entrepreneur give a talk on how useful this was for him.  He told the crowd that Andrew Carnegie had hired a consultant to follow him around for a few weeks and determine how to make him more efficient.  At the end of the research phase, Carnegie sat down with the man and asked him to report on his findings.  The man suggested that everyday he write down 3 things and get those 3 things done first at all cost.  Carnegie originally found this to be preposterous and got angry, immediately asking the man how much he owed him for such consulting services.  The man said in return, no need to pay me now, I will come back in a year and you will determine then how much you can pay me.  A year later he paid him $1 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure its a story that could be applied to any businessman in any time setting, but this was how I first heard and I thought I&#039;d share it here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random (possibly incorrect source) of info in regards to getting 3 things done everyday.</p>
<p>I once heard an entrepreneur give a talk on how useful this was for him.  He told the crowd that Andrew Carnegie had hired a consultant to follow him around for a few weeks and determine how to make him more efficient.  At the end of the research phase, Carnegie sat down with the man and asked him to report on his findings.  The man suggested that everyday he write down 3 things and get those 3 things done first at all cost.  Carnegie originally found this to be preposterous and got angry, immediately asking the man how much he owed him for such consulting services.  The man said in return, no need to pay me now, I will come back in a year and you will determine then how much you can pay me.  A year later he paid him $1 million.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure its a story that could be applied to any businessman in any time setting, but this was how I first heard and I thought I&#39;d share it here <img src='http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephCalahan</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-3/#comment-11725</link>
		<dc:creator>StephCalahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-11725</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I could not agree more on your perspective around phone calls and voicemail.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could you share the link for X1?  I&#039;m interested in checking it out.  You might also look at EasyReach (PC based).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a number of techniques that you can use to manage your to dos.  One challenge with a traditional to do list is that people put too much on it and then need to re-write it every day.  The old pages don&#039;t get tossed, so multiple lists end up floating around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One focusing strategy is the 3 items on a 3x5 card that you mentioned above.  This is just an abbreviated version of a longer to do list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another strategy is to have 3x5 cards on hand and put only 1 to do on each card.  You keep the cards in one central location.  Then, at your regular planning time, you sort the 3x5 cards in priority order and pick the top 3 to focus on.  This strategy works well when you have priorities that change frequently and you do not want to continually rewrite a list. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have found that my clients either love this system or completely hate it --  definitely polar -- but for those that do like it, they find fabulous success using it.&lt;br&gt;To your success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I could not agree more on your perspective around phone calls and voicemail.  </p>
<p>Could you share the link for X1?  I&#39;m interested in checking it out.  You might also look at EasyReach (PC based).</p>
<p>There are a number of techniques that you can use to manage your to dos.  One challenge with a traditional to do list is that people put too much on it and then need to re-write it every day.  The old pages don&#39;t get tossed, so multiple lists end up floating around.</p>
<p>One focusing strategy is the 3 items on a 3&#215;5 card that you mentioned above.  This is just an abbreviated version of a longer to do list.</p>
<p>Another strategy is to have 3&#215;5 cards on hand and put only 1 to do on each card.  You keep the cards in one central location.  Then, at your regular planning time, you sort the 3&#215;5 cards in priority order and pick the top 3 to focus on.  This strategy works well when you have priorities that change frequently and you do not want to continually rewrite a list. </p>
<p>I have found that my clients either love this system or completely hate it &#8212;  definitely polar &#8212; but for those that do like it, they find fabulous success using it.<br />To your success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie LH Calahan</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-2/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie LH Calahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I could not agree more on your perspective around phone calls and voicemail.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could you share the link for X1?  I&#039;m interested in checking it out.  You might also look at EasyReach (PC based).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a number of techniques that you can use to manage your to dos.  One challenge with a traditional to do list is that people put too much on it and then need to re-write it every day.  The old pages don&#039;t get tossed, so multiple lists end up floating around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One focusing strategy is the 3 items on a 3x5 card that you mentioned above.  This is just an abbreviated version of a longer to do list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another strategy is to have 3x5 cards on hand and put only 1 to do on each card.  You keep the cards in one central location.  Then, at your regular planning time, you sort the 3x5 cards in priority order and pick the top 3 to focus on.  This strategy works well when you have priorities that change frequently and you do not want to continually rewrite a list. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have found that my clients either love this system or completely hate it --  definitely polar -- but for those that do like it, they find fabulous success using it.&lt;br&gt;To your success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I could not agree more on your perspective around phone calls and voicemail.  </p>
<p>Could you share the link for X1?  I&#39;m interested in checking it out.  You might also look at EasyReach (PC based).</p>
<p>There are a number of techniques that you can use to manage your to dos.  One challenge with a traditional to do list is that people put too much on it and then need to re-write it every day.  The old pages don&#39;t get tossed, so multiple lists end up floating around.</p>
<p>One focusing strategy is the 3 items on a 3&#215;5 card that you mentioned above.  This is just an abbreviated version of a longer to do list.</p>
<p>Another strategy is to have 3&#215;5 cards on hand and put only 1 to do on each card.  You keep the cards in one central location.  Then, at your regular planning time, you sort the 3&#215;5 cards in priority order and pick the top 3 to focus on.  This strategy works well when you have priorities that change frequently and you do not want to continually rewrite a list. </p>
<p>I have found that my clients either love this system or completely hate it &#8212;  definitely polar &#8212; but for those that do like it, they find fabulous success using it.<br />To your success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovi_Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-2/#comment-11726</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovi_Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-11726</guid>
		<description>Mark,&lt;BR&gt;Sorry for the late comment - just read the post (my wife gave birth to a new son on Tuesday:))&lt;BR&gt;My most successful productivity hack comes from, of all people Mike Tyson. When preparing for big fights he set his training schedule to times when nobody else was working. No interruptions, minimal meaningful emails coming in and almost no calls from within your time zone. Make your uptime, everyone else&#039;s downtime. Practically this means getting your most important work done either late at night or early in the morning. It also means working while traveling. &lt;BR&gt;To that end, I set productivity metrics for myself. Last year, I flew between South Florida and Chicago twice every week (excluding summer and vaction, where I had a considerably slower travel schedule), as well as regular East Cost trips. I created a travel time metric. Basically, from door to door I wanted to be working for more than 50% of the total time drain. It doesn&#039;t sound like much, but consider driving to the airport, waiting in security lines all for short flights. The point was not to always acheive a solid &quot;work day&quot; on the road, it was to always be aware of my passing time. This self-imposed challenge got me to think about how to better maximize my productivity.&lt;BR&gt;These are my thoughyts on a subject I have devoted a great deal of effort toward. Again, great post, especially #2.&lt;BR&gt;Ovi&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />Sorry for the late comment &#8211; just read the post (my wife gave birth to a new son on Tuesday:))<br />My most successful productivity hack comes from, of all people Mike Tyson. When preparing for big fights he set his training schedule to times when nobody else was working. No interruptions, minimal meaningful emails coming in and almost no calls from within your time zone. Make your uptime, everyone else&#39;s downtime. Practically this means getting your most important work done either late at night or early in the morning. It also means working while traveling. <br />To that end, I set productivity metrics for myself. Last year, I flew between South Florida and Chicago twice every week (excluding summer and vaction, where I had a considerably slower travel schedule), as well as regular East Cost trips. I created a travel time metric. Basically, from door to door I wanted to be working for more than 50% of the total time drain. It doesn&#39;t sound like much, but consider driving to the airport, waiting in security lines all for short flights. The point was not to always acheive a solid &#8220;work day&#8221; on the road, it was to always be aware of my passing time. This self-imposed challenge got me to think about how to better maximize my productivity.<br />These are my thoughyts on a subject I have devoted a great deal of effort toward. Again, great post, especially #2.<br />Ovi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovi_Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-2/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovi_Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Mark,&lt;BR&gt;Sorry for the late comment - just read the post (my wife gave birth to a new son on Tuesday:))&lt;BR&gt;My most successful productivity hack comes from, of all people Mike Tyson. When preparing for big fights he set his training schedule to times when nobody else was working. No interruptions, minimal meaningful emails coming in and almost no calls from within your time zone. Make your uptime, everyone else&#039;s downtime. Practically this means getting your most important work done either late at night or early in the morning. It also means working while traveling. &lt;BR&gt;To that end, I set productivity metrics for myself. Last year, I flew between South Florida and Chicago twice every week (excluding summer and vaction, where I had a considerably slower travel schedule), as well as regular East Cost trips. I created a travel time metric. Basically, from door to door I wanted to be working for more than 50% of the total time drain. It doesn&#039;t sound like much, but consider driving to the airport, waiting in security lines all for short flights. The point was not to always acheive a solid &quot;work day&quot; on the road, it was to always be aware of my passing time. This self-imposed challenge got me to think about how to better maximize my productivity.&lt;BR&gt;These are my thoughyts on a subject I have devoted a great deal of effort toward. Again, great post, especially #2.&lt;BR&gt;Ovi&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />Sorry for the late comment &#8211; just read the post (my wife gave birth to a new son on Tuesday:))<br />My most successful productivity hack comes from, of all people Mike Tyson. When preparing for big fights he set his training schedule to times when nobody else was working. No interruptions, minimal meaningful emails coming in and almost no calls from within your time zone. Make your uptime, everyone else&#39;s downtime. Practically this means getting your most important work done either late at night or early in the morning. It also means working while traveling. <br />To that end, I set productivity metrics for myself. Last year, I flew between South Florida and Chicago twice every week (excluding summer and vaction, where I had a considerably slower travel schedule), as well as regular East Cost trips. I created a travel time metric. Basically, from door to door I wanted to be working for more than 50% of the total time drain. It doesn&#39;t sound like much, but consider driving to the airport, waiting in security lines all for short flights. The point was not to always acheive a solid &#8220;work day&#8221; on the road, it was to always be aware of my passing time. This self-imposed challenge got me to think about how to better maximize my productivity.<br />These are my thoughyts on a subject I have devoted a great deal of effort toward. Again, great post, especially #2.<br />Ovi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide Di Cillo</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-2/#comment-11727</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide Di Cillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-11727</guid>
		<description>I really find interesting #2. I actually think that &quot;no folder&quot; is the future of personal computing in general, like on iPhone. You don&#039;t need to go look in a fold for that music file you want to listen or that picture you are looking for. Applications today are smart enough to do that job for you and our search tools are much more advanced then when the concept of folder was created. If in 1984 we had Spotlight, I&#039;m sure we never had folders on the Macintosh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really find interesting #2. I actually think that &#8220;no folder&#8221; is the future of personal computing in general, like on iPhone. You don&#39;t need to go look in a fold for that music file you want to listen or that picture you are looking for. Applications today are smart enough to do that job for you and our search tools are much more advanced then when the concept of folder was created. If in 1984 we had Spotlight, I&#39;m sure we never had folders on the Macintosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide Di Cillo</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/01/12/productivity-hacks/comment-page-2/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide Di Cillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=1736#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>I really find interesting #2. I actually think that &quot;no folder&quot; is the future of personal computing in general, like on iPhone. You don&#039;t need to go look in a fold for that music file you want to listen or that picture you are looking for. Applications today are smart enough to do that job for you and our search tools are much more advanced then when the concept of folder was created. If in 1984 we had Spotlight, I&#039;m sure we never had folders on the Macintosh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really find interesting #2. I actually think that &#8220;no folder&#8221; is the future of personal computing in general, like on iPhone. You don&#39;t need to go look in a fold for that music file you want to listen or that picture you are looking for. Applications today are smart enough to do that job for you and our search tools are much more advanced then when the concept of folder was created. If in 1984 we had Spotlight, I&#39;m sure we never had folders on the Macintosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
