How to Work with Lawyers at a Startup

by Mark Suster on January 21, 2010

bobloblawI recently read a post over on VentureHacks titled, “Top Ten Reasons Entrepreneurs Hate Lawyers” written by Scott Walker (who blogs on legal issues for entrepreneurs).  I know that people have an allergy to lawyers out of fear of being screwed.  Much of this is unfounded – some is not.  If you’re a startup and you don’t have a close relationship with a few law firms you’re really missing one of the most important relationships that any entrepreneur can have.

If you don’t follow the image reference above or the tag line,You don’t need double talk; you need Bob Loblaw (try saying it out loud), and if you care! the link is here.

This all got me thinking about a post on how to best work with lawyers.  This is stuff I tell people verbally at least twice / month so I’m glad to finally get it into written format.

1. When to get a lawyer - If you plan to be a venture or angel backed technology company (what I mostly write about) the best time to start meeting and getting to know lawyers is long before you ever start your company.  Many people start companies arse backwards.  They get together with a few buddies, bounce around ideas, build some code (sometimes internally, sometimes through contractors), start talking to potential angel investors and then register their company.  This is one of the biggest source of future problems for the company.  I write about some of the lessons in my post on Startup Mistakes.

So eventually you have your company funded but only 2 of the 5 people who started the company are still around.  You never got around to agreeing exact equity splits but you had many conversations about it.  I wonder how the shunned three are going to feel when you make your millions?  Your memory – they never worked very hard and didn’t want to commit.  Their memory – the idea was theirs in the first place and you ran with it and didn’t include them.

Your contractor wrote a great V1 of the product and it helped you get angel funding.  Now you have money and a crack new tech architect and you’ll have to rebuild everything.  Shame about not getting it in legal writing that you owned the original IP.  But I’m sure he’ll never remember your company when Google buys you for $500 million and he’s still eating Ramen – right?

Founded it as a California LLC but your potential VC wants a Delaware C-Corp?  Forget to get around to setting up that Employee Stock Option Plan and want to be able to give the early guys their options at a low strike price?  Shame about that pesky FAS 157 ruling.  Oh, they didn’t cover that in your Stanford CS course?  Sorry. I’m sure the IRS will be flexible and your friends will forgive you for their big, unexpected tax burden.

2. But I don’t have money to pay a fancy lawyer – I’ll just have my cousin do it - Don’t.  Your cousin specializes in entertainment law – that’s different.  I know he’s smart but you wouldn’t hire a Javascript developer to do your database design – would you?  Here’s a hack for you.  Most lawyers that  work with startups are willing to work on a deferred payment schedule.  They’ll only do this if they believe you’re a high potential team and are likely to raise money at some point.  Consider it a sales & marketing expense for them.  They want to lock in future clients at an early stage.

If you make this cut then they will usually defer the payment until your funding.  For a very small fee they can get your Delaware C corp registration, make sure that you have IP protection and ensure you didn’t make an early bumbling mistakes that you’ll pay for dearly in the next 7-10 years of hard work.  They’ll help you ensure that any money you raise doesn’t come with surprise terms that are hidden in legalese.  They usually ask for warrants (basically like a stock option) in exchange for taking a deferred fee.

Like anything in life, if you want a fair deal on the deferred fee and warrant percentage you need to talk to a few lawyers to make it competitive.  They’ll find a way to get to the right price if they believe you’re high potential.

3. Additional value outside of legal documents – Most lawyers who work with early stage startups secretly want to be entrepreneurs but they earn too much money to quit – the golden handcuffs ;-)   I’ve found that the best of them think like entrepreneurs, though, and hang out at startup events.  So you can become friends with these people just like NORMAL people and, don’t worry, you’re not going to get a bill for having a beer with them.

I find that one of my best sources of deal flow is from lawyers.  Because many great entrepreneurs work with lawyers in registering their companies they have their ear to the pavement on the earliest of company formations.  I recently wrote a post on how to get access to VCs and angels where I outlined why lawyers are such an important tool for VC introductions.

Think about it – on every company we fund there is a lawyer representing the company.  We spend hours with them discussing and negotiating the details of the company.  When we invest they are often the company counsel so we see them at board meetings.  When we want to sell or IPO companies they’re there again.  Our lives are intertwined.

So I tell you this because if you build a strong relationship with an early-stage VC they can be a great source to help you with your funding.  They can and will provide introductions.  The best firms have whole departments dedicated to just this.  I know that DLA Piper does.  I think they’re one of the best firms nationally at this.  The website for their Venture Pipeline group is here.  I’m sure other firms have similar – feel free to add in the comments section.

4. How to choose a lawyer -First, you need to pick a firm.  I personally like startups to work with firms based on three criteria: local, right sized and startup focused.

Local: many entrepreneurs like to use their old friend from Boston even though they’re now living in Boulder.  That makes no sense to me.  The additional benefits of working with a local law firm or the local branch of a national law firm are too big to ignore.  As I said previously they’ll tap you into the funding source.  They’ll invite you out to events in which you’ll meet their other clients, you can get to know them socially and hopefully develop a real mentorship relationship where every conversation is not on the clock.

Right sized: I tried to work with one of the best known firms in Silicon Valley.  In the initial stages I found that I struggled to get their attention because they also represented all of the biggest titans in town.  My piddly little funding deal was dwarfed in comparison to the huge M&A deals they were negotiating.  Sure, they’ll take you on.  But try getting the time of the A players.  You’ll get the scraps.  I think you’ll end up with a newer lawyer who’s trying to build her book of businesses.  And worst still, you won’t even be her top priority.  You’ll also suffer from their billing rates.  I learned all this the hard way.  Every town has firms that focus on startups – find them.

Startup Focused – My one carve out for working with the big brands is that many of them have internal practices that focus on startups.  I already mentioned DLA Piper.  I’ve met several people from Cooley Godward who have stellar reputations in this category.  I know Mike Lincoln in Washington DC does.  I worked with Sam Angus at Fenwick & West.  He’s totally tapped into the startup communities in Silicon Valley and a bit in LA.  So it doesn’t have to be a small firm.

But as with consulting, PR, web design and even VC – it’s not just the firm it’s also the individual.  In every firm there are A, B and C players.  Good people and evil people.  Focus on the partner you would be working with.

5. How to manage costs - One of the biggest frustrations that people have with lawyers are unexpected costs.  You have this perception that they’re billing you for the lunch meeting they invited you to and the friendly banter emails flying back and forth.  I know the industry as a whole has been plagued with criticism over over billing and personally I think much of this criticism is deserved.  I saw the same bad behavior in consulting.

But it doesn’t have to be that way and the responsibility lies with you.  For company registration, angel deals, Series A & B funding, Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOP), IP filings and even litigation it doesn’t need to be that way.  I always try operate on the “Fixed Fee +” arrangement.  If you’re doing a “vanilla” funding, the lawyer pretty much knows how much effort will be required.  So I ask them for a “fixed” budget.  That’s the amount that at the end of the project I expect to see.  The “+” is what I’ll allow them to bill me for in an “exception” if (and only if) something totally whacky pops out.  And I ask them to tell me in advance if it bubbles up.

The key to being happy with your bill at the end is simple: no surprises.  Be fair, let your lawyers earn.  But make it competitive.  I also am a very loyal person.  I always tell the lawyers that I work with that if they’re fair on pricing and do great work I promise to make it up to them in intros for future work.  I think most people would say I’ve held that bargain.

Also, don’t send shite to your lawyers that you can do yourself.  I’ve seen startup CEO’s send requests like, “can you please update our Cap Table with the latest stock option allocations approved at the board meeting?”  My email response (in my head, not sent), “can you please waste more money having expensive lawyers do something that you could / should easily do for free?”  Be practical about what you ask your lawyers to do.

6. Traps to look out forBram Cohen, the investor of BitTorrent, covered the topic on VentureHacks here.  One issue he talked about was working with partners.  I also like to work with partners.  It’s true that you get a higher billing rate but as Bram points out they can often get the work done in way less hours.  If they’ll agree to do your work directly – go for it.

But I also know it’s not realistic for the partners to do all of the work.  So make sure when you do your analysis on which firms to work with that you also meet the associates you’ll actually be doing work with.  I work a lot with Dave Young (david.young@dlapiper.com) at DLA Piper.  He works a lot with Nick Hobson, an associate who’s a star.  Associates matter.  Get to know them. [does that qualify for the discount on my last engagement with you guys ;-) ]  I like the WYSIWYG approach to working with lawyers – I don’t want the partners pitching the work and it gets completed behind the scenese by somebody I’ve never met.

Another big “gotcha” for me is that you expect lawyers to help you negotiate good deals.  What I found is that most lawyers will tell you what all the terms mean and sometimes will tell you what is commercially normal but they NEVER explain to you just how certain terms can be used to screw you in the future.  You cannot just say these clauses are “legalese” and I’ll let my lawyer figure them out.  You need to own your legal agreements.  You need to know how liquidations preferences work.  You need to know how “tag along” rights could potentially screw you.  You can’t just understand “redemption rights” in theory.  That’s why I love VentureHacks.  And Brad Feld.  He was the first guy that I saw demystify the legal terms in his term sheet series.  This is a must read for all entrepreneurs.

When you’re doing biz dev deals or customer deals you need to start with a list of the things that you think could go wrong or that you want to protect against.  Write them in English (or your native language) and then ask your lawyer to think about how to protect for them.  Not the other way around.  One CEO I work with was working on a agreement with a major company.  The agreement they sent said, “we may offer your services to our customers.”  This went unnoticed by the CEO and the lawyer.  I asked a simple question.  WTF is the definition of “may?”  In human speak that sounds like they also have the other option, “may not.”  What a waste to sign an agreement that someone “may” offer your service.  That kind of shite doesn’t always get picked up by lawyers.

Be detail oriented.  Own your outcomes.  Lawyers are your support staff not your brain.

7. The good guys – There are many.  Giff Constable has started a great national list here.  It’s an awesome service to entrepreneurs, thank you.  TrueVentures goes one step further with a broader recommendation list here (I hope to add this tab to our website in our next rev.  True is always one step ahead of the curve)  My additions below:

  • I’ve already covered David Young at DLA Piper.  He mostly covers Southern California.
  • I really had a great experience with Sam Angus at Fenwick & West when I lived in Silicon Valley.
  • I have worked extensively with Scott Alderton (yes, he was having a bad hair day in the picture on the link!) of Stubbs Alderton, a firm that focused exclusively on early-stage tech, media and game companies in Southern California.  They have a stellar reputation and know how to work with the earliest of starts with entrepreneurs.
  • If you’re doing litigation work and want one of the best national firms who will work on a contingency arrangement (e.g. much of their fees are paid only if they win) then check out Steven Sklaver over at Sussman Godfrey.  Disclosure: he’s my cousin.  And he’s also a Cowboys fan.  But if you can stomach that he’s a star and contingency work / risk sharing on IP claims is key!
  • Don Lee at Buchalter Nemer was referred to me by Todd Gitlin and came on very high recommendations as an early-stage, true entrepreneur’s perfect lawyer because he understands how to work with startups.
  • On later stage LA Tech M&A deals I’ve heard there’s none better than David Hernand of Gibson Dunn
  • In Silicon Valley the name I hear mentioned most often for very early stage deals is Joey Tran from Fortis.  He represented us at one firm I invested in and did a great job.
  • We’ve had great experiences with Michael Pfau in Santa Barbara.
  • I never met a person who didn’t talk about Mike Lincoln of Cooley Godward in DC.
  • Anyone who does IP law in Southern California seems to use Knobbe Martens

Feel free to add any of the good guys in the comments and/or make sure to them over on Giff’s list.  Feel free to also add your best tips (or traps) on working lawyers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • HackerNews
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • I have to admit, the reason I tend to resist moving towards getting a lawyer is because I assume they will take an over-protective, limiting role. Just another person to convince why I want to do things unconventionally.

    Do I have a totally warped view of the client-lawyer relationship?

    Thanks for these articles that really shed light on the details of entrepreneurship.
  • Sheng G.
    Hi Mark - I have been enjoying your blogs on this site from the beginning of this new year. It is really fabulous. I do appreciate it.

    One question is that there is no recommended startup lawyers here in the Chicago and Wisconsin area. It looks like the recommended lawyers here are only from the west and east. Thanks.
  • alainlapter
    Hi Sheng.
    While I am located in the DC office of Drinker Biddle and Reath, we have an office in Chicago that regularly handles work related to start ups. I would be more than happy to discuss whatever questions you may have.
  • Mark! Thanks so much for this blog entry. This is EXACTLY the information I need at this point in my project.
  • Awesome. Good luck.
  • WeslyM3000
    Hi Mark,

    This is a very interesting post. _ I recently moved out here from the PA to journey out to Silicon Valley. Im here in LA now during the transition, I have a question.

    How do I find get a Patent Attorney from Silicon Valley if I live here now, or do you suggest me getting one from LA regardless of my decision to move in March.

    This is a huge issue for me because the same goes for the founding team, co-founders and etc. I came out here on my own, and people rarely take single member companies seriously. I actually sent you an email on LinkedIN a few months back.

    Wesly
  • Wesly,
    Connect with me on facebook or linkedin and let me know what you're working on and what stage you're at. Happy to introduce you to some lawyers up here, if it makes sense.

    Nothing wrong with being a single person company at first... In fact, I think Mark has mentioned in a number of posts that companys should have single founders.
  • Wesly, if you're moving to Silicon Valley I would probably search for a patent attorney up there. Best to network with other startups to find out who they used and liked / didn't like. Good luck.
  • Great post (a lot better than the linked to post... not sure that guy has a start up background???--ironic given part 4)

    Anyway, a few comments:
    Regarding lawyers helping you negotiate: I think it gets even worse than not explaining the terms. I think some lawyers intentionally don't help you. Here's my conspiracy theory: Most A-list lawyers are more loyal to the VCs funding you than YOU! This is especially true if the attorney made the initial introduction. This makes sense, since the attorney has done deals with that VC multiple times before and they intend to continue doing deals with them. So who do you think their loyalties lie with? Someone they've known for 15 years and done 3-4 deals with or their new client?

    Secondly, its important to not just choose the right firm, but also the right lawyer in that firm--there are a variety in all the top large firms. I remember choosing between 2 guys both from top 5 firms here in the valley: 1 was an A-lister who's done dozens of IPOs and M&A and 100s of VC deals. The other was a younger guy who is on his way to being an A-lister, but still a few years away. We went with the A-lister thinking.... how could you turn this guy down, he's going to open so many doors for us. Well it turned out that none of the intros he made carried any weight for us. We ultimately left and went to the other younger guy, who has been awesome.

    There is a big misconception that an attorneys' intro carries weight. You always hear about how attorneys are great at introducing you to VCs. Well, attorneys can make some intros here and there, but those intros will be no better than bumping into a VC at a party and getting a meeting afterwards. Even if the attorney is a "big name," most VCs dont really care what he thinks. Don't ever pick an attorney based on how connected they seem to be, or which VCs theyve done deal with.

    Once you've narrowed down the kind of firm you want, you need to find an attorney that really believes you are the next big thing. That is far more important than some sort of perceived A-list status. Now when I need an intro from our attorney, he picks up the phone and says that we are one of the best companies in the entire firm, and that he wouldn't bother picking up the phone if we weren't. His opinion still doesn't carry weight, but those kind of words gets someone's attention and will get you much farther than a shitty intro from a big name.
  • Roman, lots of great points here:
    1. I don't agree that startup lawyers "intentionally don't help you" but I do agree with your sentiment that you have to be careful about the fact that the lawyers are often closer friends with the VCs than they are with you. That's a valid concern. But I have found most startup lawyers to have very high ethics.
    2. Person over firm - always.
    3. VC's listening to lawyers - I think you'd be surprised. But it obviously depends on the lawyer.
    4. Big a law firm where you'll be important in their portfolio and thus shout louder for you - I totally agree with this. Applies to lawyers, PR firms, accounting firms, etc.
  • Got private emails to add: Lee Weinberg in LA and Alain Lapter at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP who focused on trademark / copywrite law
  • benwidhelm
    Great post Mark. Wanted to add another name to your list of good guys: Dan Burnham and Strategic Law in LA. They were on the buy-side when we sold a number of Vivendi Universal Net assets to the Vendare group; they more than held their own with our group from Latham & Watkins.

    Definitely startup focused, super intelligent, strong roots in Southern California. Unfortunately we didn't have your advice when we started and got to them a little late in the game but they were already prepared for the mistakes we made...

    Keep up the good work.
  • Thanks, Ben. I haven't come across Dan yet but I'll look out for him now that I know he's out there.
  • Michael Harrington of Fox Rothschild and Stephen Goodman of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius are excellent startup lawyers in the Philly area. Both are heavily involved with the early stage company scene + many of the local angel groups and vcs.
  • Great. Thanks for the input.
  • Timely article, we are exploring taking equity in several startup tech companies and your advise is great. We have visited with several attorneys that work with startups and so far most are reasonable about billable time and fees.
  • Mark, good article. You make some very valid points. I wanted to share one of my own blog entries regarding the same topic. http://www.vcdeallawyer.com/2009/09/21/hiring-t...
  • One last piece of advice that may not be intuitively obvious that I got from my an ex (a lawyer):

    If you are working with international terms, or are immigrants, find someone who can speak your language.

    IE if you are an Israeli, or are a company that has Israeli developers, try finding a lawyer than can explain stuff and potentially draft contracts in Hebrew (only if you have a dev team in israel). It is to your benefit that you understand what is going on around you. Many law firms for international business reasons have lawyers that are fluent (or mostly fluent) in multiple languages. Ask for the help.
  • Interesting. Hadn't thought of that. Thanks.
  • I shadowed my ex in his firm. It's how I discovered I would never be a good lawyer. He's a superb lawyer. Alas, in international tax. (Though if you need a really good international Tax attorney in San Francisco, I have a name? it does come up occasionally with startups, due to the way the C corps can be structured.) I got a lot of insight of how lawfirms work. Most people won't ask, even though the law firms (particularly large lawfirms) usually have people around.

    If I am not mistaken, his (newly-wed!) wife does do startup work with Cooley out of the Palo Alto office, and is fluent in Spanish and english, and mostly Fluent in Portuguese and Hebrew. As I said, it's worth it to ask. You would never know otherwise.
  • Great, great, great article. Thanks so much for this; I find it very valuable. I will help spreading it right now.
  • Rob
    Thank you Mark - great read. Very valuable! Any "Good Guys" you can recommend in Las Vegas? I am surprised how many killer start ups are here.
  • Sorry. Don't know Vegas lawyers. Anyone else know?
  • One important thing that I would add some emphasis on to this excellent post (albeit you did make reference to it) is the fact that as a CEO you CAN NEVER outsource legal expertise. What I mean by that is, you really must educate yourself on the legalities and nitty gritty terms which comprise the term sheets. You did mention that, but I think it really does need to be emphasised here. To rely solely on the counsel of your lawyer and forego the burden of gaining some basic legal knowledge yourself is dangerous, sometimes lethal.

    I'm not saying due your own legal work, but what I am saying is become well informed on the legal aspects affecting your business/industry, that way when you do set about choosing a legal partner you will be much more equipped to select the right one, as well as save a lot of time on contract discussions (and costs).

    I've just seen too many CEO's "outsource" all the legal knowledge to their law firm. Even if they have a top Law firm, they are vulnerable in doing this.

    As we're sharing legal contacts for Entrepreneurs I can recommend Chris Grew at Orrick in London. He's very switched on and well connected here.
  • For those of you trying to educate yourself, the BEST single reference to the legal needs of a startup and the ramifications of your decisions is: "The Entrepreneur's Guide to Business Law" by Craig Dauchy and Constance Bagley. http://www.amazon.com/Entrepreneurs-Guide-Busin...

    (Disclosure: Craig Dauchy is an attorney at Cooley; who is also my employer - read the reviews (5 star), decide for yourself. For those of you in San Diego, contact me; I have a few copies of the chapter on raising venture capital. eotterson@cooley.com)
  • This is a really good point. If you dont know a lot about VC terms, etc, one of the things you should evaluate when choosing an attorney is his ability to educate you.

    Before we did our first financing, I knew the "big things," but realized there were A LOT of little details that I knew nothing about. We spent a lot time listening to our attorney educate us on all of the details. It made the total fees a bit greater, but we became completely informed and were able to make all of the decisions. It may seem tempting to just let your attorney make decisions since he's done so many more deals than you, but outsourcing decision making will make you incredibly vulnerable. Great point.
  • And it's so easy now to be informed on these things! This wasn't the case a few years back before we had the on-line resources available like Brad Feld's Term Sheet Series (mentioned by Mark) where I it actually all made sense to me, albeit I had to adapt this for the UK. Another invaluable reference are the articles from Frank Demmler; http://bit.ly/7EIs2k. Despite all the books I've read on term sheets these two FREE on-line resources provided me with the best education on this.

    Also a lot of law firms now hold free legal surgeries for startups so there really is no excuse nowadays for CEOs not to be educated on legal aspects. We have quite a few doing this now in London and in February I'll be presenting with Keystone Law about the legal and practical issues of using crowd-sourced funding as a means of alternate financing.

    Never in the history of Entrepreneurship has so much legal information and know-how been freely available. Credit too, to guys like Mr Suster et al for providing open-source insight into the hitherto mysterious world of venture capital.
  • A. I agree whole heartedly.
    B. Too, funny. I also used Chris when I was in London. He was great. So was Stuart Penwarden. They were both at Broebeck, Hale & Doer then. I'm not sure if Stuart is at Orrick now but he was awesome.
  • R O'Leary
    Check this out: my review of the best US lawyers working in the start-up space:

    http://www.legal500.com/c/us/mergers-acquisitio...
  • derekadesso
    If you are an early or (very) early stage company it is often a bit more difficult to attract the attention of the more prominent firms, especially when a deferred payment plan is necessary to afford them. I have found that much in the same way that a lawyer/law firm can provide valuable introductions to investors, an introduction to a law firm from someone they respect goes a long way.

    I am currently meeting with firms in the San Diego area as my start-up prepares to raise our first round and I will make sure to report back with any recommendations. Any SD recommendations would be much appreciated as well!
  • Dave Young is based out of San Diego. Cooley Godward also has some great lawyers down there.
  • Wain Fishburn is a partner in Cooley's High Tech Business Group in San Diego. He is excellent.
  • Another great post, Mark. I'm going to add your suggestions now.

    Entrepreneurs definitely should take the time to meet a few startup lawyers in their region before making a choice, and try to get referrals from other local startups.

    I *totally* agree with your comment below that lean startup does NOT mean ignoring the fundamentals of starting a business. I've been pulled into situations with messy cap tables, no founder vesting, bad or no IP agreements, and it can be a nightmare to clean up. At least learn about the land mines and DIY your own clear letters that everyone signs if you're not ready to incorporate and do proper IP agreements, stock purchase agreements, etc.
  • I can also tell you that sometimes investors shy away from spending time with companies that have "messy" situations. If you do - it's important to clean them up before trying to raise $$$.
  • As usual, great stuff Mark! The only thing I would add is that entrepreneurs need to educate themselves on law just as they need to get up the curve on other things like finance, sales, etc. The last thing you want to do is to pay your lawyer by the hour to teach you basic legal vocabulary. The good news is that there are so many tools out there today to do this. Check out StartupCompanyLawyer.com which is the blog of WSGR partner Yokum Taku. If you're raising money, check out the WSGR term sheet generator. It's funny, I get a lot of traffic on my blog for this post on what a liquidation preference is.

    Bottom line...you are often the rate limiting factor in how "good" your lawyer is so get as smart as you can ASAP.
  • ... okay, I'm behind in my blog reading ...

    Furqan - thanks for the hat tip. Agree that one of the best things an entrepreneur can do is educate themselves as much as possible. From my perspective, one of the occasionally frustrating things about what I do is answer questions from clients that I've already answered on the blog -- and reading with the opportunity to think and absorb -- is easier than having me trying to verbally explain an abstract concept that involves algebra.
  • Thanks for those links! I've been trying to educate myself on the business/financial side of developing a company and those look like great resources.

    If anyone has suggestions for good books on these topics, that would be excellent.

    -Nicky
  • Hi Nicky, see my recommendation/response to David Smuts below – It is just the book you are seeking(even recommended by Yokum Taku, who, I have to admit has an enviable and useful blog himself.)
  • Totally agree with you. Tried to make this point but obviously not eloquently enough
  • cthomaschase
    Scott Alderton did our Series A work, what a great resource and sounding board! Guys like him can really help a young entrepreneur navigate the waters, from both a business and legal viewpoint, because they've seen so many deals.
  • Yes, I've had similar experiences. Thanks for sharing.
  • Here's my dummy's guide to what I look for in a lawyer:

    1. Very few mistakes.
    2. Work gets done really fast.
    3. Refined email and verbal communicator.
    4. Tells me about legal and business things I didn't think about. (Comes up with a tax-saving idea out of nowhere.)

    We also have a lawyer list on Venture Hacks: http://venturehacks.com/articles/social-lawyers (also see the awesome comments). I'm updating that post to include a link to your list here and True's list.
  • Laurent Boncenne
    Thank you ! I've been searching on the subject to find out exactly what you answered here.
  • This is a terrific, terrific post Mark. Skimping on your counsel, or hiring too late, is a huge rookie error. One key bit of advice I would add: do not, under almost any circumstances, hire the corporate counsel suggested by your VC.

    That counsel is likely excellent. And they will represent your fairly.

    But, they will be forever slightly torn. Your counsel represents your company, not you. But one thing they don't represent is the investors.
  • Yeah, I have to admit I thought of that and purposely didn't write it. Mostly because I often recommend to entrepreneurs to use lawyers that I like! But your point is correct (except lawyers that I recommend ;-) Thanks for the input and for calling me out on it.
  • Great post, I couldn't agree more. If you're in the Bay Area, Harold Yu and Vincent Law at Orrick are both fabulous to work with.
  • Thanks for adding the names.
  • saw the headline and said thank you. so "Every town has firms that focus on startups – find them."? ok, that effort will be made, and if it doesn't turn out, reads golden here, and a trip home to LA sounds way worthwhile now. more recent resources would be venturehacks.com/articles/social-lawyers and venturebeat.com/tag/ask-the-attorney/ - gotta appreciate Scott Walker as it seems he has sparked this wonderful mess of lawyer advice recently!
  • Yes, Scott has been very active in blogging on the topic. It's great.
  • Frederick Cook
    Hey Mark, I'm enjoying the blog.

    I'm involved with a bunch of small projects, and for each one, I'm working with a few different people. I have no idea which one will end up being a serious company; all of them have potential to scale. With the biggest one, I have all the agreements in place and a deferred payment plan with a lawyer (Ken Maready in Blacksburg, VA), but does it make sense to do this with every idea?

    A lot of entrepreneur blogs, especially guys in the Lean Startup camp, would tell you that it is more important to just do work: put together prototypes and show them to customers, before spending a lot of time parading your ideas around.

    Thoughts?
  • Any blog or group of people that says focus on prototypes rather than protecting IP, equity ownership, etc. is simply ... wrong.
  • Frederick Cook
    Mark, one of my favorite posts of yours is JFDI:

    “Why?” he asked. I told him he wasn’t a real entrepreneur. He looked stunned. I said that he had been talking about doing this for too long. He still had no website and no prototypes. But “he didn’t have the budget to hire a developer until he had raised money!”

    I said that was my point. “A real entrepreneur would have done it anyway. He would have found somebody technical and inspired that individual to work for equity or deferred payment. Real entrepreneurs are contagious. They are filled with ideas and they get those ideas onto paper. That paper can be in the form of wireframes or in the form of a PowerPoint plan. Or worst case your ideas can be conveyed verbally. But they GET THINGS DONE. You have the skills and knowledge to do that.”

    ... Now I don't mean to use your words against you, I'm genuinely interested here.

    If you're "filled with ideas and you get those ideas onto paper," do you then go and incorporate each of those ideas before talking to potential collaborators, developers, potential customers, etc.?

    Now, I understand in the JFDI post you were trying to make a point, but did you also tell him to get a lawyer, set up equity contracts with any technical people he inspired to work with him, and incorporate?

    I guess my real question is, don't people do this every day, and have to go pick up the pieces a bit later? Maybe they lose a bit more of their company or have to settle with a developer they worked with once upon a time, but they work these things out anyway?
  • Frederick,

    My view is that every aspiring entrepreneur who's mocking up wireframes should have a company registered. It's super easy and cheap. You can do this by searching under "delaware c corp" or "delaware s corp" on Google. No, you don't necessarily need a lawyer at that stage. But if you're getting serious about building a company some day then networking is vital to you. So you'll network with the obvious people: other entrepreneurs, angels, vc's, etc. One of the groups of people that should be on your list is startup lawyers - even before you're ready for their services. I don't think it's inconsistent with JFDI.

    Mark
  • Frederick Cook
    Mark, thanks for responding, definitely helpful to get that insight on the priority. Thank you for making yourself available as well.
  • Mark – great post. Two quick comments:

    1) Craig Johnson (founder of Venture Law Group and who sadly recently passed away) wrote an outstanding chapter in the book The Silicon Valley Edge with respect to the role of lawyers in connection with startups. Here are a few solid quotes: “Lawyers are better positioned than other professionals to provide the kind of business advice and contacts beginning entrepreneurs need. . . . It is often a lawyer’s ability to make a key introduction to a potential source of funds or corporate partner that a beginning entrepreneur values most. . . . Although start-up lawyers in Silicon Valley draft documents and follow form books, too, they usually play a much larger role in the businesses being started. . . . Silicon Valley can be thought of as a network of networks, with certain people acting as gatekeepers. The successful business lawyer is one of those gatekeepers. Others in the network value their judgment and experience.”

    2) With all due respect to my fellow corporate lawyers, financings and most of the other legal work for startups are not rocket science. That’s why, for a startup, finding an experienced corporate lawyer who genuinely cares and is passionate about the practice of law is more important than the bio/resume.

    Thanks again,
    Scott
  • I agree that it's not rocket science, which is why fundings need to be cheaper. For seed deals we now use the Y combinator open-source term sheet rather than the NVCA. And we'll often share a lawyer with the company to save costs.
  • In NY we have worked with or our companies have with these guys and all have been very good!

    Charles Torres - Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt
    Ronald Herbst - Herbst and Associates
    Ward Breeze - Gunderson Dettmer
    Adam Dinow - Wilson Sonsini
  • Awesome, Jay. thanks for the input.
  • Coincidentally I had my first serious meeting with a startup-focused lawyer (excluding the patent lawyer) just this morning, regarding a new legal entity selection. Thankfully, from the beginning or our startup we avoided the common pitfalls you mentioned.

    I have read quite a lot about startup-focused lawyers commonly offering to defer fees. I was very happy to find that true in my case also, after a long conversation about the viability of the business of course. In my case I was initially connected through an entrepreneur network, and I know of others that will link ents with lawyers for some gratis consulting. I hadn’t thought of the deal-flow angle, I like my guy so far but I’m definitely going to look around more with that in mind.

    One thing that I found very helpful, and luckily was exposed to early, was information about IP and patent law. I believe you had some good references in a past post, Mark, but there are a lot of other good introductory resources out there. You sum up a lot of it nicely in this post.
  • Glad you found your lawyer. If you know of some great links to IP / patent law resources feel free to post link. I don't know any off hand.
  • Phillip Morelock
    The Bob Loblaw Law Blog!

    Good post, Mark. Lawyers always seem to cost more than one wants to pay, but -- like plumbers -- you certainly don't want to do this on the cheap. These are all good tips, and like you said in point 3, you can end up being pleasantly surprised by additional value added.
  • Thanks, Phillip. I was hoping that most people would just get the reference from seeing the image but I didn't want to change it - especially with the international audience. Of course, there's also the Chicken Dance ;-) http://www.break.com/usercontent/2009/6/arreste...
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: How to Present at Big Meetings without Going Down a Rat Hole

Next post: Building Products for Mass Adoption