<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entrepreneurs Should be Respected, Not Loved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur turned VC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-9341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-9341</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, especially with the part &#039;Doing nothing is avoiding real leadership&#039;. Next time before I make some decision, I will think about that. :)))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#39;t agree more, especially with the part &#39;Doing nothing is avoiding real leadership&#39;. Next time before I make some decision, I will think about that. <img src='http://bothsides.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-7295</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-7295</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, especially with the part &#039;Doing nothing is avoiding real leadership&#039;. Next time before I make some decision, I will think about that. :)))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#39;t agree more, especially with the part &#39;Doing nothing is avoiding real leadership&#39;. Next time before I make some decision, I will think about that. <img src='http://bothsides.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-7292</link>
		<dc:creator>JC Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-7292</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you strongly on your defense of Zuckerberg and Facebook in general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Changes in a service tend to infuriate customers. Innovation in a customer-facing technology company usually results in more customer service complaints than it resolves. As far as I can tell, Facebook as a service is horrifically unstable, weak as an ad platform (ignoring the scale of the revenues - Myspace was once also impressive), and questionable in terms of its IPO scheduling judgment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like you a lot, Mark, but I&#039;m confused about your evaluation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, effective leadership will piss people off. But it&#039;s foolish leadership to make decision after decision that infuriates your customers. It leads to a collapse of the company. Every time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a side note, I hardly use Facebook at all, and have always disliked the service. The whole concept of an internet-within-an-internet harkens back to the early days of AOL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your reading of AOL history is also skewed. Perhaps you forget, but they relied on volunteers to handle their customer service. A class-action lawsuit in filed in 1999 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Lead...&lt;/a&gt;) put an end to that, and crushed AOL&#039;s competitive advantages relative to other dial-up providers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So... be more rigorous, Mark, you&#039;re supposed to be a Venture Capitalist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you strongly on your defense of Zuckerberg and Facebook in general.</p>
<p>Changes in a service tend to infuriate customers. Innovation in a customer-facing technology company usually results in more customer service complaints than it resolves. As far as I can tell, Facebook as a service is horrifically unstable, weak as an ad platform (ignoring the scale of the revenues &#8211; Myspace was once also impressive), and questionable in terms of its IPO scheduling judgment.</p>
<p>I like you a lot, Mark, but I&#39;m confused about your evaluation. </p>
<p>Yes, effective leadership will piss people off. But it&#39;s foolish leadership to make decision after decision that infuriates your customers. It leads to a collapse of the company. Every time.</p>
<p>As a side note, I hardly use Facebook at all, and have always disliked the service. The whole concept of an internet-within-an-internet harkens back to the early days of AOL.</p>
<p>Your reading of AOL history is also skewed. Perhaps you forget, but they relied on volunteers to handle their customer service. A class-action lawsuit in filed in 1999 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Lead&#8230;</a>) put an end to that, and crushed AOL&#39;s competitive advantages relative to other dial-up providers.</p>
<p>So&#8230; be more rigorous, Mark, you&#39;re supposed to be a Venture Capitalist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-9342</link>
		<dc:creator>JC Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-9342</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you strongly on your defense of Zuckerberg and Facebook in general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Changes in a service tend to infuriate customers. Innovation in a customer-facing technology company usually results in more customer service complaints than it resolves. As far as I can tell, Facebook as a service is horrifically unstable, weak as an ad platform (ignoring the scale of the revenues - Myspace was once also impressive), and questionable in terms of its IPO scheduling judgment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like you a lot, Mark, but I&#039;m confused about your evaluation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, effective leadership will piss people off. But it&#039;s foolish leadership to make decision after decision that infuriates your customers. It leads to a collapse of the company. Every time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a side note, I hardly use Facebook at all, and have always disliked the service. The whole concept of an internet-within-an-internet harkens back to the early days of AOL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your reading of AOL history is also skewed. Perhaps you forget, but they relied on volunteers to handle their customer service. A class-action lawsuit in filed in 1999 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Lead...&lt;/a&gt;) put an end to that, and crushed AOL&#039;s competitive advantages relative to other dial-up providers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So... be more rigorous, Mark, you&#039;re supposed to be a Venture Capitalist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you strongly on your defense of Zuckerberg and Facebook in general.</p>
<p>Changes in a service tend to infuriate customers. Innovation in a customer-facing technology company usually results in more customer service complaints than it resolves. As far as I can tell, Facebook as a service is horrifically unstable, weak as an ad platform (ignoring the scale of the revenues &#8211; Myspace was once also impressive), and questionable in terms of its IPO scheduling judgment.</p>
<p>I like you a lot, Mark, but I&#39;m confused about your evaluation. </p>
<p>Yes, effective leadership will piss people off. But it&#39;s foolish leadership to make decision after decision that infuriates your customers. It leads to a collapse of the company. Every time.</p>
<p>As a side note, I hardly use Facebook at all, and have always disliked the service. The whole concept of an internet-within-an-internet harkens back to the early days of AOL.</p>
<p>Your reading of AOL history is also skewed. Perhaps you forget, but they relied on volunteers to handle their customer service. A class-action lawsuit in filed in 1999 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Lead&#8230;</a>) put an end to that, and crushed AOL&#39;s competitive advantages relative to other dial-up providers.</p>
<p>So&#8230; be more rigorous, Mark, you&#39;re supposed to be a Venture Capitalist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindygallop</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-7291</link>
		<dc:creator>cindygallop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-7291</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more.  And LOVE LOVE LOVE the &#039;Chief Psychologist&#039; designator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#39;t agree more.  And LOVE LOVE LOVE the &#39;Chief Psychologist&#39; designator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindygallop</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-9343</link>
		<dc:creator>cindygallop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-9343</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more.  And LOVE LOVE LOVE the &#039;Chief Psychologist&#039; designator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#39;t agree more.  And LOVE LOVE LOVE the &#39;Chief Psychologist&#39; designator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapil Poojari</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-7290</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapil Poojari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-7290</guid>
		<description>Mark, Could not agree more. But I think there are good and bad decisions made which could be identified  based on the results of that decisions. People should not disrespect a leader just because of their few bad decisions. Everyone take good and bad decisions in many aspects, its not only limited to a leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, Could not agree more. But I think there are good and bad decisions made which could be identified  based on the results of that decisions. People should not disrespect a leader just because of their few bad decisions. Everyone take good and bad decisions in many aspects, its not only limited to a leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapil Poojari</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-9344</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapil Poojari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-9344</guid>
		<description>Mark, Could not agree more. But I think there are good and bad decisions made which could be identified  based on the results of that decisions. People should not disrespect a leader just because of their few bad decisions. Everyone take good and bad decisions in many aspects, its not only limited to a leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, Could not agree more. But I think there are good and bad decisions made which could be identified  based on the results of that decisions. People should not disrespect a leader just because of their few bad decisions. Everyone take good and bad decisions in many aspects, its not only limited to a leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathanjaeger</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-7288</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathanjaeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 01:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-7288</guid>
		<description>There have been several times in Facebook&#039;s history where people form groups to boycott Facebook because of recent changes or complain for a few days on their status updates. Those attempts at rage have been short-lived. While this recent privacy issue has probably drummed up the most bad press and seems to be the clearest threat to Facebook&#039;s potential (and legacy), it might be the best business decision. The path that Facebook is taking is one of maximum profit, not necessarily following some utopian ideal of free-flowing information. Maybe Facebook loses some overly concerned users over this issue, but maybe they stay the course and make more profits despite that loss. I&#039;m not an advocate for Zuckerberg&#039;s methods, and I would prefer the default settings to be &quot;private&quot;, but anyone who is aware of the situation to the extent that they can delete their account is also aware that they can change their privacy settings. I guess only time will tell whether the recent changes are make-or-break decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been several times in Facebook&#39;s history where people form groups to boycott Facebook because of recent changes or complain for a few days on their status updates. Those attempts at rage have been short-lived. While this recent privacy issue has probably drummed up the most bad press and seems to be the clearest threat to Facebook&#39;s potential (and legacy), it might be the best business decision. The path that Facebook is taking is one of maximum profit, not necessarily following some utopian ideal of free-flowing information. Maybe Facebook loses some overly concerned users over this issue, but maybe they stay the course and make more profits despite that loss. I&#39;m not an advocate for Zuckerberg&#39;s methods, and I would prefer the default settings to be &#8220;private&#8221;, but anyone who is aware of the situation to the extent that they can delete their account is also aware that they can change their privacy settings. I guess only time will tell whether the recent changes are make-or-break decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathanjaeger</title>
		<link>http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/05/13/entrepreneurs-should-be-respected-not-loved/comment-page-2/#comment-9345</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathanjaeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 01:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/?p=2624#comment-9345</guid>
		<description>There have been several times in Facebook&#039;s history where people form groups to boycott Facebook because of recent changes or complain for a few days on their status updates. Those attempts at rage have been short-lived. While this recent privacy issue has probably drummed up the most bad press and seems to be the clearest threat to Facebook&#039;s potential (and legacy), it might be the best business decision. The path that Facebook is taking is one of maximum profit, not necessarily following some utopian ideal of free-flowing information. Maybe Facebook loses some overly concerned users over this issue, but maybe they stay the course and make more profits despite that loss. I&#039;m not an advocate for Zuckerberg&#039;s methods, and I would prefer the default settings to be &quot;private&quot;, but anyone who is aware of the situation to the extent that they can delete their account is also aware that they can change their privacy settings. I guess only time will tell whether the recent changes are make-or-break decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been several times in Facebook&#39;s history where people form groups to boycott Facebook because of recent changes or complain for a few days on their status updates. Those attempts at rage have been short-lived. While this recent privacy issue has probably drummed up the most bad press and seems to be the clearest threat to Facebook&#39;s potential (and legacy), it might be the best business decision. The path that Facebook is taking is one of maximum profit, not necessarily following some utopian ideal of free-flowing information. Maybe Facebook loses some overly concerned users over this issue, but maybe they stay the course and make more profits despite that loss. I&#39;m not an advocate for Zuckerberg&#39;s methods, and I would prefer the default settings to be &#8220;private&#8221;, but anyone who is aware of the situation to the extent that they can delete their account is also aware that they can change their privacy settings. I guess only time will tell whether the recent changes are make-or-break decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

