How to use PR Firms at Startups

One of the most frequent questions entrepreneurs ask about when they raise a little bit of money or are getting close to launching their first product is whether they should hire a PR firm.

There is obviously no black-or-white answer, but I’ve tried everything from working a large international agency, to hiring in-house people to doing it myself.  This post is a short guide to what I’ve learned:

1. PR is a process, not an event - For starters let me say that you shouldn’t do PR around milestones.  It’s a continual process.  You need to take months & years to build relationships with journalists.  You help them on stories, act as a source, develop real relationships, read their stories and eventually when you have news they’re more willing to have a conversation. They get pitched by so many blowhards that more genuine people who aren’t in it for just a story stand out from the crowd.  I wrote about how to build relationships with journalists in this post.

2. PR isn’t something that can be delegated – The other thing that tech execs often want to do is to delegate the PR to their marketing person. Obviously you should have somebody that helps you research journalists, gets you meetings, pitches stories, helps prep you for interviews & helps make sure your writing is cogent.  But some CEOs then try to have more junior people in the company take the interview.  In a startup this is a mistake.  Heck, even in a big, successful company like Salesforce.com the CEO, Marc Benioff, still takes many of the interviews himself.

The reality is that a journalist who’s writing a story about you – a relatively unknown entity – wants to hear directly from the founders and/or the CEO.  You have to learn how to interact with journalists, understand how to do interviews, understand how to frame a story and get comfortable with the fact that if you want PR coverage you’re going to have to dedicate a non-trivial amount of time to it.

I was talking a month ago with a founding team who was lamenting the fact that their competitors got way better coverage than they did when they felt that their traffic numbers were > 2x the competition.  I pointed out the fact that they only ever talked to the press when the had an announcement and that it was a continual process.  They seemed to understand what I was saying but not be interested in putting in the effort.  Their competitors took it seriously.  And as a result their competitors were able to raise a considerable VC round from well-known firms.

3. PR on a limited budget – So, should you use an external firm?  Let’s say you’ve raised only a modest sum of money (sub $2 million) yet you still want to get coverage.  In this instance I typically recommend that startups NOT hire a big, well-known PR firm.  My rationale is that you won’t have enough budget to be able to get enough of the senior team’s focus.

All too often I’ve seen senior PR people from big firms come in and pitch for new business to startups while having 22 year-olds who do all the work once it’s won.  And even then this newly minted college graduate will be working on multiple clients at the same time.  They don’t have enough billable hours to be able to really understand what you do or effectively pitch it.  Plus, with so many other clients they will likely be pitching a journalist several stories.

If you feel you need outside help I recommend either going with a small firm local to you or an individual who is working as their own agency.  You need somebody for whom your business is important enough for them to care about the results (and they’re obviously hoping you’ll grow and become more successful).  Actually, this is usually the same advice I give people about recruiters, accountants, lawyers and similar trade professionals.

There is one carve out.  There are some excellent PR firms that will occasionally take a “strategic view” on you as a startup.  Maybe they think you have a terrific background & solid investors so they’re betting you’ll become a big deal and they want to get in early.  I’ve seen this model work really successfully for others.  But generally I think it’s best to go small until you become larger and have larger budgets for PR.

One successful model has been to find the uber-connected people who led the shift in PR from traditional to social media – people like Brian Solis or Shel Israel - and work with them to drive extraordinary results relative to costs.  There are a few people out there with these skills but they’re in great demand.  And I know that Brian has a much broader practice now covering research, business strategy & change management.

4. PR in house – Equally I often recommend that teams hire somebody in-house.  You can do this by hiring somebody who has multiple functions of which one is PR, hiring an intern who has PR experience, hiring a consultant 2 days / week or hiring somebody full time.  Obviously this is dependent upon available budgets.

But as I often tell teams, working with an agency (in whatever capacity) is mostly a waste if you don’t have somebody on the inside of your company who is working closely with the outside firm.  You need somebody who is helping push out information on what is up-and-coming in the company.  You need somebody who can react quickly to inbound journalist questions.  You need somebody who is thinking laterally about how to creatively get extra attention at conferences or trade-shows.  You need somebody who REALLY understands your company, its customers and its competitors. And you need somebody who is committed to keeping up your presence in blogs, social media and other online forums.

At almost every portfolio company I work with I encourage them to think hard about hiring internal PR staff.  In my opinion it’s worth its weight in gold.   Whether we like to admit it or not, PR drives behavior with customers, investors, employees and competition.  What is said about you publicly matters.  And one of my favorite sayings about PR is, “if you don’t define the story about you, somebody else will.”  I believe in a good offense.

5. PR with a major firm – Once your business is scaling and you have the money to pay for a major agency I personally can’t think of any marketing budget that is more effective.  A great PR firm coupled with a business that is doing meaningful things is golden.  It’s the best marketing ROI in my opinion.  The ability to get inches in major journals (NY Times, WSJ, The Economist) as well as your industry trade journals and tech blogs in invaluable.  I can’t overstate how important it is in shaping influencers.  The number of stories that I have in my career about a senior executive who read about a company in a magazine on a flight, clipped the article and then followed up directly are numerous.

And when you work with an external PR firm you can’t keep them on a short leash, trying to measure their immediate impact one whether they got you X number of articles or Y numbers of inches.  It will take them time to know your company, socialize your story with the right journalists, wait until those journalists are gearing up to write relevant stories, etc.  You need to have a longer-term view on PR results.

Some final thoughts on PR

1. Be authentic – Nobody likes being spun.  Nobody likes talking to a robotron who spews out corporate BS again & again like a politician on a Sunday morning talk show avoiding the questions.  Talk like a human.  Give real answers.  Show a sense of humor and humility.  I notice, for example, that some CEO’s on Twitter never do anything but parrot their companies news.  I find this so inauthentic.  And then others will send out company info but occasionally show a human side.  Always more appealing.  That’s why keeping a personal blog is so great.

2. Have a point-of-view – Too many senior executives are risk averse when it comes to talking with the press so they tend to either be milquetoast in their responses or sit on the fence.  That’s fine if you’re a senior exec at Apple – you’ll get inches anyways.  But for you as a startup you need to have a point-of-view on topics.  You need to be wiling to take risks and be out-on-a-limb with your views.  I’m not talking about being aggressive against companies, disparaging people or saying inappropriate things to get covered.  I see too many people who do that.  But be willing to have an informed view about – GroupOn, Google doing social networking, whether apps is a better metaphor than browsers, whether Quora is really a transformational product – whatever!  In doesn’t have to be these cliched topics – you just have to have & express opinions.

3. Don’t cry wolf - There are companies who send press releases every time they launch anything – practically putting out press releases announcing they fixed a bunch of bugs.  And then when they have substantive news they’re surprised that nobody takes it seriously.  Make sure you’re not spewing out meaningless reams of press releases.  It’s OK to push out extra ones on your website or blog.  It’s OK to produce a lot and then selectively push them out via different news sources.  Just don’t spam people.  Or when you send the good stuff it will get lost in the sauce.

4. Get media training - One of the most useful exercises I did with a major agency was “media training” where they taught me how to do interviews & how to handle TV.  It was invaluable and has shaped my press interviews ever since.

I’m the kind of person who likes to answer every question in detail.  I feel it’s my duty to respond to every question and make sure the person asking understands my answer.  The problem with this in interviews is that you can take an interview totally off course of the journalists asks questions that aren’t relevant to your story.  Media training helped me figure out how to keep interviews on track and focused on the story I’m trying to communicate.  They taught me to keep things simple and repeat the key points to make sure that they come across.

Thank you to Nathan Lustig who reminded me to included this by writing his excellent commentary here in the comments section, the key points of which are:

“We hired a PR firm to help us for about 2 months around our launch. They helped us get some good stories, but their biggest value add to me was that they gave my cofounder and me media training and actionable feedback.

They gave us a few mock interviews, helped us distill our 8-10 big points into the three most important that would interest journalists most and then listened to us giving our for 5-6 interviews. Then we did “after action reports” where the person who listened in told us what we did well and where we sucked.”

This is some of the most valuable knowledge you will acquire the first time you work with a PR firm.

*** Appendix (just an aside, no need to read):
Wait a second.  How can you advise on PR?  You? The guy who has typo’s in every blog post?

Once / month I get comments on my blog about how horrified some reader was because I spelled your as “you’re” or some similar mistake.  Yes, I went to school.  And I actually got pretty decent grades in English and writing overall.  And yes I learned that you can’t start a sentence with “and.”

When I write I’m looking for human tone rather than perfect sentences.  I write on my blog how I think in my head.  When I write business letters I use perfect sentence structure.  And complete sentences.  And no irony.  I optimize for output of thoughts over spelling perfection.  If I worried about that latter I’d write half as much.  Which I know would greatly please those who are so annoyed by typos ;-)

Posted in Uncategorized
  • http://twitter.com/petewarden Pete Warden

    All good advice, but one thing I would especially highlight is “Be authentic”. I write for ReadWriteWeb, and the hardest thing for me is finding the real story, something human that will engage readers. A lot of startups think to be 'professional' you have to act very cagey and reserved when interviewed. That sort of antagonistic relationship makes it almost impossible to spot the details that make a story that people will want to read. Did your founder raise seed funding by winning poker tournaments? That's far more useful than knowing that your sales figures are up 14% from December.

    Here's the sort of thing I mean – the Backtype team sat down with me for three hours and gave me an in-depth tour of their technology, with no restrictions. That gave me enough background to produce a piece that told the story of a tiny team on a shoestring budget taking on the big guys:
    http://www.readwriteweb.com/ha

    I'm not guaranteeing that you won't get shafted by an unscrupulous journalist, but I think founders generally overrate the danger of talking to us. It just doesn't make any sense to skewer an unknown startup, that's not a good story, and even in the worst case negative publicity is better than none at all.

    Anyway, if you're a data startup, reach out to me on Twitter – @petewarden – and help me discover what you do. No guarantees that it will ever lead to a story, but that's how things start.

  • janetaronica

    Ah I gotcha then :) In that definition of intern, full agreement.

  • http://twitter.com/iCrowdApps Ted Kao

    Like the post. I'm actually trying to pull off PR on our own and are looking services such as prweb or prmac when we launch our iOS related apps. Not sure how it will go but we'll also try to personally call some of the tech bloggers around the country.

  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    Thanks for the feedback, Francis.

  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    I wish it didn't. It does.

  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    For sure they need to know your company. That's why I opt for smaller firms that are more likely to take the time to know you – or in-house folks or consultants.

  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    Thanks for calling in, Roger. I actually advocate a “both/and” strategy. I don't like to lose the small, independent person who got you to where you are. But the larger firms with big budgets and large staff have the “reach” that is unlikely in a smaller PR. You get the best of both worlds. But it costs $$$.

  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    Much as I'd like to, Russell, I can't consultant for companies for which I'm not an investor. I'd recommend trying to find CEO's who have had a bit of success in the local area you work. They're more likely to have the time anyways. Good luck.

  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    Cheers, Pete. Great comments. I agree about authenticity 100%. And as a data guy myself, I'm now following you on Twitter to see the stream of some of these stories!

  • http://www.marketingprvisie.com Remco Janssen

    Definitely true. Although the company had it's buyout nine months ago. Now we are shapeshifting from startup PR to corporate tech PR. Luckily most of us are seasoned in both areas. Would love to read a follow up post on how to incorporate PR after the big buy out! I'll give you a few hints: words like corporate identity and stock value are suddenly pretty important… ;-)

  • ladylaff

    Hi Mark, I've been working in technology PR & communications for 20 years and I think this is one of the most eloquent and accurate advice for entrepreneurs on the topic I have ever read. The reason I started my own consultancy recently is so I would be free to offer services in a way that is compatible with these realities. One other point I would add is that when executives are actively involved in the PR process in the way you describe, they gain very valuable input from industry third parties that they can use to improve their business strategies. Thanks again for a wonderful post that I plan to share on with my contacts!

  • http://www.angseliusronn.se Marie Angselius

    Mark – this was a thoughtful post. And I fully agree with you that PR is a key tool as its the only way to receive a Thought Leadership position if you have that big and game changing idea. Focusing on this industry in Sweden I can in many cases see that companies are better off hiring a long term agency who will bring in the knowledge of getting you out there. To often Corporate Positioning is less prioritized than Product Marketing. Best, Marie

  • Bob Walters

    Mark –

    I like your work *and* your writing. And (see, I'm authentic too!) you make excellent points in your piece.

    At a slightly higher level, my opinion on “whither PR” is:

    1. If you're not sure that you need a dedicated PR function, you don't.

    2. You don't really need a PR function if you have nothing to say. If what you want to say is not topical or interesting *to readers*, no PR firm will make it so.

    3. A good sign that you need PR is that it has become troublesome to handle the inbound requests.

    4. DO NOT rely on PR for strategy. PR folks may provide good help with messaging, but not positioning.

    5. Today, 'legacy' PR firms are searching for a role beyond traditional outsourcing to big companies. The recognize that traditional media outlets now cover reduced turf. The know the SEO and UGC rule. But they are generally not expert in these functions.

    6. Press relationships held by PR firms are far less leveragable than they were even five years ago. Traditional pubs/web sites are under siege by bloggers, and bloggers want to talk with principals. The exception here might be in the case where you have content worthy of the WSJ, NYT, etc.

    I realize that I have laid out a rather bleak landscape here. My aim is not to be cynical or damning. But honestly the last time that I have seen “PR” work is maybe 2002. But then again I run software companies, not web sites. Maybe things are better there.

    In summary, PR is a necessary – maybe vital – function. My advice to entrepreneurs is to do it yourself. Then hire a mid-level employee to do it when the workload dictates. Spend the money you save on SEO and other lead-gen activities.

    Bob

  • http://www.vinovirtuoso.com Cory Landerfelt

    Fantastic post, Mark, as always.

    Quick question for anyone willing to help an entrepreneur: if we were to pursue a strategy of contracting with a number of small to mid-sized, LOCAL PR firms, what advice would you give regarding how best to find the appropriate local PR firm in each specific geography? In particular, we would want PR firms that specialize in local print and TV.

    I'm hoping for well-researched reviews or league tables of local PR firms for specific geographies, but basically I would be happy with any resource that I could use systematically without having to resort to Google and cold calling 10 firms in each locality for references? Obviously, we'd need to do our diligence well on our final choice, but we'd also like to narrow the field as much as possible in the beginning.

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

    PS – Mark, I'm from Sacramento and went to Jesuit. Believe you went to Rio. That technically makes us rivals, but I'll make an exception for you.

  • http://twitter.com/rkillgo Russell Killgo

    Thank you for the response. I look forward to sitting down with you for some coffee when the time is right for us to talk about you investing in my new company and then you can give me all the advice you want. I will keep you updated over the next few weeks as we are looking at an app launch in the middle of Feb. and then a full site launch a few weeks after that. Thanks again for your insightful words and encouragement.

  • Lucy Siegel

    Hi, Mark – I'm impressed by your blog post. You really get it! It's very rare that someone without a communications background has as deep an understanding of how PR works as you do.

    I'm the owner of a small PR firm in NYC that works with start-ups all the time. One thing you didn't mention about small PR firms: almost every small agency was born because its founder had experience at a big agency, got tired of sitting in meetings all day and wanted to actually work with clients and do hands-on PR again. In other words, when you work with a boutique PR firm, you get at least a piece of the owner (who is almost always a senior professional) on your account.

    I don't agree with your point about moving up to a large firm when the money starts rolling in. Who said that small firms can't get serious media coverage? My own company just did a 6-week project for a client that resulted in feature articles in Bloomberg BusinessWeek, TWO articles in the Wall Street Journal, Crain's New York and the National Post (Canada). Sometimes companies need more resources than their existing small firm can offer; e.g., the existing firm is doing B2B tech PR, but the company has evolved and now needs public affairs and government relations in addition. It's more time-efficient to be managing one PR company that can meet all of your needs.

    I totally disagree with the comment someone made here that small PR firms can't strategize and help with positioning. This is nonsense. Whoever said that hasn't worked with the right firms.

    I'll add my own two cents on how to select a local firm: take a look at the local PR companies that belong to networks of independently-owned small PR agencies (such as PR Boutiques International – http://www.prboutiques.com, of which my firm is a member). The networks seriously vet applicants for membership, because the exisiting members know that they may have to rely on the applicant at some point when a client needs help locally in another area. Looking at networks like this one is a good way to start the process.

  • Dave W Baldwin

    The typos are fine….good Lord, some of those bitching should take a look via when the blog is posted figuring out what hour you probably wrote it!

  • http://twitter.com/Merredith Merredith

    It's a really good post, Mark. I'll add just a few things (and thanks for the nod to my client, Fenwick & West!).

    PR can make a huge difference; of the six startups I've launched in the last year, three have been acquired (by Google, Marketwire, AmEx) and two are in major partnership talks.

    Two things every startup should look for in a PR firm/person if hiring outside — because you're right, it's an investment:

    1. Relationships in your space. I don't mean the “I can take you to a party” kind of relationships. I mean the, “this reporter knows me and will trust that I am bringing him/her an interesting story and company” kind of relationships. If you are launching a new social media platform, ask the PR person about relationships with the people who cover social media. Or a new app? Same thing. They should be able to tell you.

    2. Someone who understands startups maybe isn't a deal-killer, but it will really help. I love startups; but I understand how under water the CEO and staff can be… how I might hear from someone at crazy hours because s/he is working with the team to beat a deadline. I get that they have a BOD to report to; it's sorta like having parents sometimes. And I understand them financially — I know that cash is their oxygen, and my team acts accordingly. I get the kinds of deadlines they have to meet and their accompanying pressures. My team and I have done the launch PR equivalent of building an airplane in midair. And, I can leverage some of my larger clients to take on the cool small ones.

    3. A good PR person will understand media relations strategy as it connects to your business objectives: do you need users? Investors? Partnerships? What will make you stand out? Where should you be found? They should help you answer those questions, easily.

    Finally, agreed in general that small makes sense; in fact I left my previous Agency because, great as they were, the roller-coaster economics of startups didn't work for them. I happen to be passionate about startups, and have launches practically down to a science, so I started an Agency that specializes in that. The companies we've launched have shown up in the NYT, WSJ, TC, RWW, Mashable, VentureBeat, Wired, CNET and many more targeted cool blogs –and some were for ridiculously low project costs. But you have to hope that as the startup grows, they take you with them.

    The point is, it's totally doable if you follow the advice here and work on your story.

  • sean hallahan

    Hey Mark,
    I am the MD of an FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) company in Australia … in other words, pretty far removed from your area … and yet I have been an avid reader of your blog for about a year now. I forward quite a few of your posts to my team and enjoy your take on many universal business theme's. The only discordant note is your reasonably regular defence/apologies regarding your writing style … I felt compelled to finally write to you & say you don't need to defend your style anymore … it obviously works & most importantly for you. Anyone who has an issue with that a) should get a life and b) exercise their unalienable right to stop reading & stop wasting your time.
    All the best … Sean

  • http://www.biggerpockets.com Joshua Dorkin

    Great write up, Mark. How do you recommend startup CEOs foster these relationships with the press when there is simply nothing “newsworthy” going on? It is one thing to contact folks when you've got something happening, but I hardly think that they have the time to shoot the breeze, nor want to, when you've got nothing doing. I look forward to your thoughts!

  • adityavempaty

    Great insights, being at startup currently and thinking about how we want to do our PR with regard to Product launch or announcing a round or investor is def a process rather then a one time event. I have to ask though which makes a bigger splash a round or a product announcement or both at the same time?

  • adityavempaty

    P.S. your typos are awesome I feel like I am hearing you speak when I read your blog due to it :)

  • http://www.brekiri.com/blog/ Greg4

    I'm looking forward to putting this stuff into practice. PR seems like one area where people expect results without really spending time on it. Like with everything else, that rarely works.

    Here's another nuts-and-bolts topic I would love to see some time: Planning productive out-of-town trips, such as trips to meet with investors and other contacts. I've seen some people who are able to pack their entire schedule with useful meetings and manage the whole process gracefully, but I haven't gotten there yet. I have a feeling you're one of those people.

  • http://www.gchicco.com Gianfranco Chicco

    Very useful advice at the right moment… in fact, all these kind of advice of yours for startups make you the most on-target speaker to invite for La Red Innova in Madrid…

  • http://twitter.com/alanweinkrantz Alan Weinkrantz

    Be a good client. You don't just hire a PR firm or PR consultant. It's a partnership. You have to create a body of work that goes beyond press releases. Engage with your CTO and have him / her involved in the PR process. Make sure you have the time to engage with your PR partner. This does not happen on its own.

  • http://thirddayluxurysoaps.zoomshare.com Cynthia Hill

    thank you for the valued information. this was a question that I needed to know the answer to for a long time. Third Day Organics is a small business that I starteda few years ago. We manufacture Eco-Friendly Bath/Body and Spa products. You can check us out at thirddayluxurysoaps.zoomshare….

  • http://twitter.com/MarkHall123 Mark Hall

    Thanks for the great read. As a startup founder, PR is constantly one of the toughest tasks to manage. Distinguishing between what is really newsworthy vs. what I think people should care about is drastically different. Bringing in internal or external parties to assist with this process can be crucial. As my company continue to grows, I will re-visit this article to ensure that I am considering all angles. Thanks Mark!

  • http://twitter.com/marypcbuk Mary Branscombe

    To give a journalist point of view, this sounds like the kind of PR that will help us get stories from startups; authentic, realistic representation is really helpful. On having a point of view; absolutely – but don't let your PR team push that too much. I get far too many pitches that say 'tiny firm X has a view on huge issue Y' and too often it's really reaching. Be informed, have an opinion on things that matter and give your opinion when it's relevant and I'll care about it.

  • Hmeth

    Mark, glad to see your media trainers got the machete out and forced you to pare down your thoughts;-). This is one of the most beneficial outcomes from a good session and can and should be extrapolated into every communication scenario, not just media interviews.

    As a longtime media trainer and former network news producer I've seen too many scary-smart people not be able to crystallize their thoughts succinctly, confidently, conversationally – whether in an interview or even in a meeting.

    So if any of your readers have been media trained or they are contemplating it, hope you all practice and reinforce some of what you've learned on an ongoing basis. It would be a shame to waste a set of skills that will truly set you apart.

  • http://twitter.com/coletteballou Colette Ballou

    I am going to re-tweet this every 3 weeks or so, it was so good.

    One really important point: some start-ups are not at the point where they need PR. We spend a lot of time reviewing their business model & progress, and often advise them to spend their money on salespeople, SEO, etc. – not PR at that moment. There's an inflection point in every start-up's growth when PR is the best way to attract the next 1000/1,000,000 users (varies on whether or not you are B2B or B2C, what you are selling, where you are based).

    Also, there is a point where the budget is too small to do effective PR. Any agency, any professional worth their fees should be straight up with you about both these points. If not, run away.

    Oh yes, disclosure: I am Colette Ballou, founder of Ballou PR, we focus on high-growth companies.

  • ben

    Mark,

    I'll definitely look for this post when I'm in that position. Thank you so much.

    ben

  • http://twitter.com/Frank_Strong Frank_Strong

    This is a very compelling post, Mark. I especially like your definition that “PR is a process, not an event.” This is an important point — as the saying goes, it takes money to make money. Sometime it takes press to make press. The inertia to get started can be overwhelming, but once you develop a reputation as a credible source, have relevant commentary and prove to be an authentic company, a little momentum can carry you a long way. This post is a must read for PR pros as well as start-ups.

  • Alan Graner

    Your advice is thoughtful and, in my opinion, accurate. I agree an informal human tone is more effective in informal media like blogs. (And yes, you CAN begin sentences with “and”.)

    However, I must disagree about typos. Sure I've had them, which is why I insist my work be proofread before sending. To me, typos are like a salesperson's scuffed shoes–they do not inspire confidence. As for writing “your” for “you're,” that's not a typo; that's just bad grammar and is inexcusable.

    Your writing and your ideas are too good for such lapses, Mark.

  • http://craigdeakin.com/ Craig Deakin

    Mark I enjoy your blog and insights and agree with your ” Appendix ” I believe that it's more about the content and what your teaching/explaining that's valuable, not how you write.

    I believe that the way you write is more authentic because with you writing the way you're thinking it's a better way to put your thoughts across.

  • http://www.internetvisibilitytraining.com Gerald Hiebert

    Thank you for some great information. I have been researching PR as a founder of a start up that is 4 years old and trying to grow, I have been looking for ways to increase our activities. I have been looking at using article marketing and on line press releases to spur our website traffic. I am going to start getting a little media training early on, just in case…

  • http://twitter.com/standevaughn Stan DeVaughn

    I've driven PR for start-ups in Silicon Valley for longer than I want to admit. If there's one overarching pattern it is this: companies whose founders/leaders have a proclivity for media relations and promotion, the ones who are innate extroverts and enjoy the give-and-take, are always the ones who draw the most favorable attention over the longest periods. No matter if they're market leaders or laggards. There is no substitute for charisma, no matter how much media training is force-fed.

  • Alison Murdock

    Mark, insightful post. Thanks for writing it. Wanted to comment on a couple of PR-related issues – speaking opps and events. As a co-founder of Under the Radar, we were pitched constantly. Shocking how few companies could really pitch themselves or position their companies via-a-vis competitors. Now, I work with startups who wanted “free” PR via speaking opps. Sadly, 4/5 companies need to go back through the rigors of business planning once more and figure out why they are the best in their space. Most often, an internal person just doesn't have the distance to see this. The funding pitch is not the speaking or PR pitch. Also, sometimes the CEO is not the best speaker – even if he/she is media trained. Events are like show biz. You have to find that one exec who gets that.

  • http://www.gallagher2020.com Timgal2

    I was introduced to Mark's blog this morning and this was the first post I read. Bingo. I am now a follower.

    This is a solid post.

    I spent 30 years in the newspaper business before starting my PR consulting firm. Knowing the journalists in the area, the stories they tend to cover, lining up the planes on the tarmac for them (because they are busier than hell these days), all of these things are best accomplished by a PR firm that knows the local territory, and not a corporate PR machine who cranks out press releases by the dozen to hundreds of email addresses. Good PR is working the local media market to gain coverage for your client.

    Nice post, Mark.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=666509627 facebook-666509627

    Really interesting and helpful.

    And, I wouldn't worry about starting a sentence with and. A cursory review of the bible would show great quantities of starting important sentences with And.

    For example:
    Jeremiah 28:1 (Whole Chapter)

    “And it came to pass the same year, … …Hananiah the son of Azur the prophet, … … spake unto me in the house of the LORD, in the presence of the priests …

    Surely if the writers of the Bible can use it, we mere mortals must have license to do so. I prefer to use a comma because when I speak it. I typically am using it after making a point and am piling on.

    However, I felt compelled to write because, while a blog is informal, I have noticed incredible grammatical, spelling, even swearing on major sites. I worry about all the kids who will only do math on a calculator and will never learn to write. I , too, make many mistakes but the Internet is in need of an omnipotent and merciful editor.

    Thanks again, for the advice.

  • http://www.danielrose.com.au Daniel Rose

    Point 3 is interesting! One of the huge benefits of working with smaller firms is that you don't get shoved down the ranks to the intern. You often work with the principal.

  • http://twitter.com/mhelmbrecht Michael Helmbrecht

    Mark, thanks for sharing this. I think your blog is spot on even for a growth stage company. I've been working through PR firm and internal PR team transitions for most of the last year trying to get the formula right. With time and experimentation, it's coming together much along the lines of your post.

  • http://www.louderback.com jim louderback

    Nice summary Mark, and definitely reflects my experience both as a journalist running magazines and news staffs, and as CEO of a startup. We've had big firms, small firms and now have someone in-house, and I think we've finally hit the right balance.

    One other really important thing is to know when to say “I don't know”, and follow up later. As CEOs, we're often inclined to think we have to have all the answers – but sometimes we just don't know.

    I learned this when I was hiring analysts at PC Week Labs – I would keep probing, trying to find a technical area that the candidate didn't know, to see if they'd admit that there was something they didn't know.

    Journalists trust people who are honest, and can say that either they don't know – or don't have an opinion on an issue.

    jim

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, there’s definitely some good advice here. But depending on where you live, it can be hard to connect with the right people. Thats why so many startups like to head out to Silicon Valley, otherwise it can be hard to get that initial contact and burst of attention. Techcrunch is notorious for requiring you to suck up hard to them to get any kind of attention. Thats why I think that the market is headed towards Facebook anyway: when somebody talks about something on Facebook all of their friends see it so its just viral in a way that Google ads are not and it seems to be inspiring the creation of an advertising industry based around Facebook fans at http://facebook.getmorepopular.com and other places. The overarching theme of future advertising is going to be headed in that direction. Yeah, if you have money hiring a PR agency is great, but it could be a lot of money a startup might not have in a lot of circumstances.

  • http://www.oceanmediainc.com Kyle Claypool

    This is good stuff – there is no One Size Fits All answer to PR, particularly for small businesses and startups. I love the PR quote you shared – “if you don’t define the story about you, somebody else will.” We give that advice to many of our clients, and urge them to execute press releases for every bit of good news they can, as long as it remains genuine and worth reading.

    We also make it a practice to highlight our clients' successes on our own website. For instance, one of our clients, MyLife.com, has been experiencing exponential growth in the last year, surpassing even LinkedIn for unique visitors. We run a lot of their press releases on our own blog, because the success of our clients is a success for us as well.

  • http://www.tracecohen.me/ Trace Cohen

    This is an amazing overview of how PR for start-ups should be done and thought of. Your first point hit home for me, as a lot of companies feel that they have a launch or announcement but, it's not just a single moment in time, it's a launch period or pre-pitching and follow-ups.

    One thing you didn't touch upon is timing. Every start-up I've worked with or have spoken too wants the big business story and interview but most aren't ready for it. And if you are good enough or lucky enough to get the story, is it the right time for it? Sometimes you only get one shot, so you really need to make sure it counts.

    For me, PR stands for “People Relations” as I am in the business of keeping my client happy and trying to constantly reading their minds!

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottjhoward ScottjHoward

    In response to your insight on PR for startups and one of your favorite startups Quora; it seemed after I saw Quora featured on Techcrunch my inbox started stacking with Quora follow notices. I haven't done the research to confirm that it was the Techcrunch feature that supplied the 'tipping point' for mainstream adoption and attention, but I suspect so. It was certainly nothing I did (no posts). It was also a testament to the power of importing your social graph for effort free network building. Could provide an interesting use case.

  • Pearse Coyle

    Mark,
    Yet again a great post – I'm a big fan.
    To amplify one point you made – you've got to have some newsworthy content. The best PR agency will not get very far with a dull story but if you've got a good story PR is great value for money.

    From June 2009 and the first 8 or so months of CorporateSpinouts.com I got a long way with some self-generated and then outsourced PR just about the unique basis for the venture (generating spinouts in the middle of this recession) but then the newsworthiness of this dried up and I was getting no return on the PR spend so I stopped.

    Now the first spinouts are popping out of the pipeline and I've got real news again so the “free” PR is starting again and will hopefully keep going with each spinout. It's the first time in my career I've not had to knock hard on doors to generate business and it is mostly PR driven.

    Pearse Coyle

  • Rob Cotter

    Excellent! Here's an aspect that's not often considered; doing to good a job at PR

    I have a strong PR background and as VP Marketing I handled PR for a startup about 10 yrs ago. What I didn't realize was that the technically we were WAY behind what I was being told.
    So when I got our company a cover story on the NYT Sunday Magazine we were in way over our heads. I handled it all professionally but the technology wasn't ripe. And when we immediately got requests from 80 certified investors our fractal CFO was fractured. He couldn't even respond. 35K hits to the website each day for a week. It all came to nothing.
    The CTO and founder was a madman and unfortunately, technical incompetence surrounded a great technology and I bailed.
    They still exist and still have not truly gotten off the ground.

    Here's the take home: Not only have something worth talking about but be able to deliver.

  • Christian Rayner

    This article has been most useful – thank you Mark. I am currently advising a successful US website on launching their service in the UK. As part of my brief, I have been asked to advise on appointing a suitable PR agent. What would be really helpful would be to hear from UK-based PR agents who have experience of working with web startups and/or environmental causes. Enquiries please to crayner@ahoythere.com.

  • http://twitter.com/userOpia Karina Bahr

    In the process of 2nd Time Start Up..Much different as we are hoping to have some capital. So PR is an unknown to me, but have been getting an education, so thanks for your words!
    When I have spoken to some PR firms they seemed to indicate “some” of their value was in the relationships that they had with members of the Press. I got the idea that the more I spent, I was paying for their relationships. I wonder whether an “intern” would be able to develop those same quality relationships for me? Would they be a good Twittern, yes, but to get me coverage that I need in the first two months, I dont know.
    Another interesting point was that I called some of the largest agencies..most were condescending, but a few actually were nice enough to refer me to the freelancers that they use on projects. I was super excited, until…. the freelancer dropped the ball….I'm starting to believe that I might get what I pay for!


Mark Suster is a 2x entrepreneur who has gone to the Dark Side of VC. He joined GRP Partners in 2007 as a General Partner after selling his company to Salesforce.com. He focuses on early-stage technology companies. Read more about Mark.

subscribe to both sides of the table

Subscribe to my RSS Feed